Worst Move Ever or It Didn't Matter for Sugar? - Survivor Sucks - Survivor Related - Survivor Sucks - Message Board - Yuku

logotop

logobottom

Home | FAQ

0 Kudo

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Worst Move Ever or It Didn't Matter for Sugar?

Started By	Comment
RobVanStratus		#41	[-]
Posts: 7494 (12/21/08 4:56 AM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	The first three episodes are not why Sugar lost. Sugar lost in the end game because she flipped on practically everyone. The only 2 she didn't backstab were Marcus and Charlie, and she didn't even get their votes. On top of that, Randy/Corinne poisoned the jury with their hatred of Sugar, costing her any chance of winning. And the Randy boot was fucking POSITIVE FOR SUGAR. The average fan hated his guts and LOVED to see him get his ass handed to him by Sugar not once, but twice in the same episode. The sweetheart taking down the prick was a great moment in that season and the fans loved it. All you fucking Sugar haters need to realize she is loved by the fans. Sugar playing was like a brand new Colleen with a little Kelly w. thrown in, naive and playing a good game without really realizing it.
craig		#42	[-]
Posts: 14613 (12/21/08 7:01 AM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	The average Fang-loving Suckster may have enjoyed what Sugar did to Randy, but not the average viewers who typically vote for James, Bob, Matty, etc. Probst loved Sugar overall, gave her a golden edit. But he liked Randy too and hated the way Sugar behaved at TC, so she paid the price. America got a glimse of the real Sugar, which ain't so pretty.
mrnoluvstill		#43	[-]
Posts: 473 (12/26/08 11:41 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	There is no way you can call Sugar even a good player, the goal of the game is to win, not give it to the person you feel deserves it most! I think she is one of the worst ever to play, by not get rid of Bob when she could!
Kirblar		#44	[-]
Posts: 7261 (12/26/08 11:58 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	craig wrote: The average Fang-loving Suckster may have enjoyed what Sugar did to Randy, but not the average viewers who typically vote for James, Bob, Matty, etc. Probst loved Sugar overall, gave her a golden edit. But he liked Randy too and hated the way Sugar behaved at TC, so she paid the price. America got a glimse of the real Sugar, which ain't so pretty. Weirdly enough, it was probably the most fairly edited episode all season.
ThrowMeGabon		#45	[-]
Posts: 80 (12/27/08 12:24 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	She lost the game when she voted out Crystal and Kenny, not Matty. Sugar could have realistically won against Kenny, Crystal, or Susie. Due to the bitter jury, Matty and Bob were guaranteed wins against her. Going to the F4 with both Matty and Bob was her writing on the wall. I know her excuse is "entertainment value", but if so, why did she allow Susie to go to the end? She could have brought along more interesting people and still won a million dollars. Verdict: Stupid bitch, but deserved to win the game over Bob and Matty.
indiekid26		#46	[-]
Posts: 5717 (12/27/08 12:47 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	The average Fang-loving Suckster may have enjoyed what Sugar did to Randy, but not the average viewers who typically vote for James, Bob, Matty, etc. Probst loved Sugar overall, gave her a golden edit. But he liked Randy too and hated the way Sugar behaved at TC, so she paid the price. America got a glimse of the real Sugar, which ain't so pretty. Oy...where to begin. You do realize that the average viewer loved Sugar and hated Randy, right? The average viewer usually champions people like Sugar and hates on people like Randy - and it's usually the other way around at Sucks, and it was. I see far more Sugar haters than lovers around here; both camps are very ardent. Probst doesn't love Sugar - I don't even know where you're getting this, not that you're foreign to hyperbole to support your cases, craig. When has he ever really gushed about her, I mean seriously? Sugar was a bitch at Randy's exit TC to give him a taste of his own medicine and watch him go down in flames - that kind of episode was meant to be overall rewarding to the average viewer. And NO I'm not some avid Sugar fan. I like the girl and all but I'm not all ZOMG SUGAR ROX SHE IS TEH MASTER STRATEGER. Do I think she deserved to win over Bob and Susie? Absolutely. Do I like that she's admitted on several occasions, whether true or false, that she was playing for the viewers and not herself - not so much. What bothers me is how a majority of the jury members prided themselves on their candor, bluntness, and bitchiness but when Sugar displayed it with her no-BS answers at the Final Tribal Council, she was crucified for it instead of held in high, relatable respect. Her not receiving any votes and Bob winning, plain and simple, just showed how a bitter jury can ruin a season.
3Diesel		#47	[-]
Posts: 414 (12/27/08 1:35 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Jeff was rooting for Sugar in his blog although he did say he didn't like her laughing at Randy
Cassidy666		#48	[-]
Posts: 9340 (12/27/08 1:35 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	indiekid26 wrote: What bothers me is how a majority of the jury members prided themselves on their candor, bluntness, and bitchiness but when Sugar displayed it with her no-BS answers at the Final Tribal Council, she was crucified for it instead of held in high, relatable respect. Her not receiving any votes and Bob winning, plain and simple, just showed how a bitter jury can ruin a season. She was crucified for it because no one could understand what game she was playing and she didn't have a response for that. She had absolutely no idea what game she was playing so why should anyone reward her for being random and stupid? Bitter or not, every juror has their own reasons for voting and the reasons for not voting Sugar were completely justified because of her own actions and behavior. Nothing ruined it more for Sugar (and for everyone) than Sugar.
aboutbreakingrules		#49	[-]
Posts: 456 (12/27/08 6:41 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	GenerallyBored wrote: Nobody on the show had any sort of game. Sugar sort of did (by accident), but Kenny was an idiot who tried to make alliances based on his attraction to whichever girl was sitting next to him, Crystal chose whoever could tolerate her bitchy attitude, Matty/Susie had a weird dominant/submissive partnership and the Father/Daughter bond of bob/sugar. Why didn't anyone think to broaden their alliance outside of their pair? Because they were all RETARDED. A whole season without a single "Player" there. Bad casting choices. Then she ensured her loss by being a bitch to Randy and Corinne. She could very easily have turned their manners against them (as Chris did Twila). It probably wouldn't have been pretty, but at least she could have gotten Randy and Corinne to shoot out their own legs. The one thing for which jurors are simply not legendary is basing their decisions on merit. Sugar may have had some game, but she behaved like a dink.

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Quick Reply

Message board courtesy of Survivor Sucks member support.
Benevolent dictatorship courtesy of Survivor Sucks Admin Idoits.