Yuku free message boards

petenale wrote:

---

PrettyGoodYear1988 wrote:

---

Yes, the audience should be greatful for being given the chance to watch her in action....
...even though she had the chance to give the audience a truly epic F3, and herself a mini-chance to win: Chrystal/Suzie/Sugar
But she didnt do that, and prefered to educate the audience and prove the Heisenberg uncertainty principle!

She is truly a good person!

Oh STFU! There is no such thing as a "good person" in Survivor anymore than there is a "good person" in a game of checkers. All Sugar's done is fuck over her own game because she can't separate gameplay from real life. She had a decent shot with Crystal and Susie in the F3 (she didn't know that the Onions were planning to vote in a block), and she blew it by getting all "moral" at the last minute. If that makes her a good person, does that make cutthroat "anything for the win" players like Cirie, Todd, Earl, Yul, or Stephenie "bad people"?

There aren't "good people" or "bad people" in Survivor. There are only good players or bad players. How good of a player you are directly correlates to how well you position yourself to win, given the circumstances you have. Thus, Sugar is a bad player.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You can play cutthroat and be a 'good' person. Sugar didn't turn against Ken/Cystal becasue they were going to vote Matty off.. She didn;t turn because they turned member of their alliance. Sugar was going to vote for Matty also. She turned against them because of the rotton way they treated Matty once they decided he was going. She thought they could vote hin off without being mean to Matty.
Maty had been a loyal ally and Sugar thougth he deserved better treatment even if he was getting voted off.

Sugar is a great player. She understand the game and she has been controling or strongly influencing every vote since she blindsided Ace.

How good of a player you are directly correlates to how well you position yourself to win, given the circumstances you have is not compltely tru or as least not teh whole truth. How good aplayer you are also correlates to how far you can advance and adjustment during the game given the circumstances you are in. It also depend on what you goals are. Sugar has decided she can't win but she want to go as far as she can and she wants to influnace who does win. She is doing great at that.

Rotten way they treated Matty? Look at what she did to Randy. Yes he was a troll and I found that whole tribal council to be the most hilarious moment of survivor, however was it completely necessary for her to laugh continuously and make him look stupid? Talk about beating someone when they're down. I mean she went to the extent of saying she hopes he dies alone. I love Sugar but thats a little hypocritical of her. And Matty whines all day about everything. If you remember he tried to get Crystal out and even voted for her the night Ace went home, but did she pout and have a hissy fit when that happened? No. However the minute Matty gets a vote he flips out! And if you recall Matty began the argument with Kenny. Yea him and Crystal went a little overboard, but nothing near what Sugar did to Randy. And plus how is Matty such a loyal ally? He didn't even become their ally until he decided to boot Randy. He even said it in one of his interviews, that when he voted for Randy, his closest ally in the game, he showed his loyalty to them. And last night after the reward challenge Matty says that he's been gunning for Crystal and Kenny since day 1, but you know thats all fair game, however if they vote Matty, he throws a temper tantrum.

So this whole thing about playing for the good guys is a load of crap. Sugar is playing to lose, which is retarded. Why even sign up for the show? And her so called Good Guys (Matty the whiny ass who can talk the talk but can't walk the walk, and Bob the pathological liar) aren't really all that good.