| Started By | Comment | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
leeter |
||||||
|
|
||||||
SurvivorArctic |
||||||
|
My GOD you are a moron!
I have zero respect for reactionary voters like you. Zero. |
||||||
Jakob Speed |
||||||
|
IPSOS: 68% SUPPORT GG'S PROROGUE
|
||||||
buried out back |
||||||
Jakob Speed wrote: Did they just poll Conservatives? |
||||||
Jakob Speed |
||||||
|
||||||
buried out back |
||||||
|
I don't think they're deserting the coalition. Many weren't totally on board in the first place. It's more like they just decided to speak up
when it would do the least pissing off of people.
|
||||||
Jakob Speed |
||||||
|
A sample of public thinking
Tim Powers, today at 6:27 PM EST Globe and Mail Time for the temperature to go down on all fronts. Time to focus on the economy. For what it is here is one of two public samplings out tonight on the state of the state: Majority (68%) of Canadians from Every Part of Country Supports Governor General's Decision to Prorogue Parliament Fear and anger grips the nation as almost three quarters (72%) of Canadians say they are truly scared for the future of the country with what is going on in Ottawa Toronto, ON -Whatever arcane elements of Parliamentary democracy or convention weighed heavily on the shoulders of Canada's Governor General Michaëlle Jean in deciding what next steps to take concerning the latest political leadership crisis to affect the country, she did so with the majority support of the Canadian public in agreeing to Prime Minister Harper's request to prorogue Parliament until January 26, 2009 when a new Conservative budget can be brought down and voted on as a matter of confidence. In this respect, a majority (68%) of Canadians from every part of the country (including 55% in Quebec), believe that Parliament should be ended now, but the Harper Conservatives remain in power until the government is possibly defeated by the coalition in January, 2009. This compares with only 29% who believe that the Conservatives should accept defeat in Parliament now and turn power over to the Coalition. And if the Prime Minister's request had not been acceded to it is clear that, given a choice, the majority (56%) believe the Governor General should have dissolved Parliament and initiated an election rather than accepting the proposal from the newly formed coalition of the Liberal, New Democratic and Bloc Quebecois parties to form the government (38%). In fact, the national poll conducted by Ipsos Reid for Canwest News Service and Global National on Tuesday and Wednesday night, and following the televised address by both the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Coalition, indicates that the Harper Conservative government has the support of six in ten (60%) Canadians to 'fight and do everything they can legally do to continue governing because of the severe economic situation the country faces, and the fact that the Liberals and the NDP have entered into an "unholy deal" with the Bloc separatists'. This compares with only four in ten (37%) who believe that 'it's proper that a smooth transition of power to the Coalition takes place'. What Canadians are witnessing has shaken them pretty much to the core: almost three quarters (72%) of Canadians indicate that they are truly scared for the future of the country with what is going on in Ottawa and the majority (62%) is angry with the Coalition taking over power from the governing Conservatives -- in fact, a majority in every region of the country is angry at the situation, except in Quebec where only 39% expressed this view. The potential backlash against the Coalition partners is now palpable in the data: if a Federal election were held today it's likely that the Conservatives would reap a very large majority government with 46% of decided voters supporting the Conservatives, compared with 23% for the Liberals, 13% for the NDP, 9% for the Bloc Quebecois (37% in Québec) and 8% for the Green party. Five percent (5%) remain undecided.
Last Edited By: Jakob Speed
12/04/08 6:37 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
||||||
leeter |
||||||
|
You get a lot of these ignorant people who say 'stimulus? you can't build roads during the winter' - which is really fucktarded because
infrastructure projects must be planned out now. Those jobs would disproportionately go towards professionals.
Without a stim package now, major infrastructure won't get under way in time for the summer rural EI "8/42" earning season. I think there's a lot of denial out west in the country about just how bad it is. The manufacturing core of the country is severely impacted - and a large number of construction projects in downtown Toronto have been canned. (Which isn't widely know yet). In Calgary - 48 dollar oil hasn't sunk in yet. They're still spending, in denial, convinced oil will come back. I was in Calgary in '91 - it's the denial before the buildings start to become see-through. Vancouver basks in the Olympics construction bubble. Who knows when that'll pop. So, yeah, I can understand why such a large number of Canadians are in denial about the coalition. |
||||||
Driv |
||||||
Vancouver basks in the Olympics construction bubble. Who knows when that'll pop.that'd be March 2010, when i'll be purchasing a nice condo in Yaletown ^_^ |
||||||
buried out back |
||||||
leeter wrote:Things are shutting down in Alberta. All the jobs in Fort Mac are supposedly drying up. No new projects are starting and most that have been in the works for a while have been put on hold. The new housing market has slowed completely. They're laying off people in the oil field/construction sectors. Where there used to be pages of ads looking for tradespeople (electricians in particular) there were 19 ads when I checked the Journal on line yesterday. Things are falling apart here fast |
||||||
Jakob Speed |
||||||
|
I worked in management for the second largest MEU in North America. We had infrastructure plans and engineering plans done years in advance waiting for
political will.
The city of Toronto has dozens of projects awaiting the funds. That is all that central planners in government do. You have your head up your ass if you think planning boards wouldn';t dust off brilliant plans that civil servants have shelved over the last decade. SA? What do YOU say about projects ready and waiting? I think you probably can name ten major ones in your workplace without thinking? |
||||||
Jakob Speed |
||||||
buried out back wrote:The company I sold for 50% of the 43% projected profit (per year annual profit) is finishing the sold houses. Shelving the rest for a while. plus my money has been in our US account since July. I almost feel guilty.... almost. |
||||||
leeter |
||||||
Jakob Speed wrote:High level plans are done. Detailed schematics are not. Codes, laws, and regulations change all the time. High level rights of way and a multitude of studies going into various urban plans are the regular course of what governments do. The actual schematics are rarely done so far in advance 'just waiting for money'. There's an intermediate period between the 'Okay, here's the money' to 'shovels in the ground'. My best friend just spent his fourth week re-drawing fire escapes for one such project that was approved four months ago. Reconsider your monopoly on knowledge. |
||||||
Jakob Speed |
||||||
|
I know of three projects requiring at least 700 million in Toronto where the COMPLETE plans and environmental clearances are on record. I know, cuz I oversaw
the IT lines being added and incorporated our needs. I have had emails from successors over changes to these plans almost every 6 months ( I left 5 years ago)
The IT infrastructure is one of the very last things put to mapping. |
||||||
SurvivorArctic |
||||||
Jakob Speed wrote:Between HEF, FII and WEPA - we are now creating NEW projects to spend the money we have that isn't federal. Seriously, I have 5 new ones on my desk as of today that I am drafting policy for. And a new MOU to fullfil. So what was your question? |
||||||
Jakob Speed |
||||||
|
Money is a fine thing to have. Spending it is pretty easy. No question ^^^
|
||||||
GraceTwo |
||||||
Jakob Speed wrote: Why does that surprise you? I support it, but it would be a cold day in hell before I vote Tory. The poll showing the Tory support doesn't mean much to me. People are still pissed with the Liberals and even more with Dion and there is enough friction in the Liberal party that I really don't think they'd chance an election right now. It would be suicide, for sure. But it's reactionary. The Conservatives are only beloved in Alberta. Talk to me when there is an election in 2 years and Dion is all but forgotten. |
||||||
scottfreek |
||||||
|
I'm just glad there's an intermission from this HORROR show of late. (and small signs of stepping back from the precipice by the Libs and CONS today) dunno if it's a sign of things to come, but CTV (CONS TV) seemed exceptionally critical of Mr. Harper today. I think the knives are being sharpened for DIsaster, but also for Stevie-POO. those will probably remain sheathed for awhile, however. IGGY and the STOOGES '09 (or '10), FTW! |
||||||
Vicconius |
||||||
Former Liberal MP slams coalition, suggests Western separation
|
||||||
Jakob Speed |
||||||
Vicconius wrote:I am betting my future on that theory.
Last Edited By: Jakob Speed
12/04/08 10:26 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
||||||