I'm still unclear why the editors banged us over the head with Kota being the god tribe, Fang sucking arse, and
Marcus being the man so repeatedly, only to have the negative losers triumph and have a turn-around edit, the feel-good winners implode and burn, and Marcus
getting booted as an arrogant prick.
It was nice for the show and all, but I'm just confused as to why they did it in the first place.
Didn't Fang lose all those challenges in reality? Hasn't Crystal's attitude been an unavoidable plot point? She even cites these in the last TC -"I've been called delusion..." Randy had issues, and it looks like it will continue based on the past- "You want a list?" And it might be an issue in the end from juror to finalist. And doesn't the Clean Slate make sense to at least warrant a consideration from you the detective?
As a detective, I'd be stupid to eliminate anyone in doing an investigation. So when I look at Corrine -I review the episodes and look at where we are now. I look at an eye roll insert when Sugar mentions her dead father, or the music played when she complains about Susie. I look at her in relation to what they are doing with other characters -mainly Sugar's manipulation. Sugar has too much of a sculpted edit about her not being dumb, and Corrine is just set dressing to accomodate it. Now if Corrine had more insightful views on her prey like Kenny has with Sugar, that would be something.
Where's the commentary on Corrine by others? We should usually have that by now -about sizing her up; anything that will boomerang back from a juror to her.
It was nice for the show and all, but I'm just confused as to why they did it in the first place.
Didn't Fang lose all those challenges in reality? Hasn't Crystal's attitude been an unavoidable plot point? She even cites these in the last TC -"I've been called delusion..." Randy had issues, and it looks like it will continue based on the past- "You want a list?" And it might be an issue in the end from juror to finalist. And doesn't the Clean Slate make sense to at least warrant a consideration from you the detective?
As a detective, I'd be stupid to eliminate anyone in doing an investigation. So when I look at Corrine -I review the episodes and look at where we are now. I look at an eye roll insert when Sugar mentions her dead father, or the music played when she complains about Susie. I look at her in relation to what they are doing with other characters -mainly Sugar's manipulation. Sugar has too much of a sculpted edit about her not being dumb, and Corrine is just set dressing to accomodate it. Now if Corrine had more insightful views on her prey like Kenny has with Sugar, that would be something.
Where's the commentary on Corrine by others? We should usually have that by now -about sizing her up; anything that will boomerang back from a juror to her.
