Modesty wrote:
Your Utopia is surely a cold place to be. I pity you.
Well, at the moment we have the Glorious American Welfare State running on all cylinders. How is it for you? Everything hunky dory? No complaints?
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
AllMenAreIslands |
|||
Modesty wrote: Well, at the moment we have the Glorious American Welfare State running on all cylinders. How is it for you? Everything hunky dory? No complaints? |
|||
ohboy |
|||
youfist wrote: oh, dear, there are so many things wrong with that. * what city would be more to your liking for obama to reside in? you obviously have an opinion. do you have an opinion on mccain living in arizona? * would you prefer obama lived in a predominantly white, hispanic or asian neighborhood instead? what should be the racial makeup of mccain's neighborhood? * the church gave obama their votes because he is black? any explanation as to why they didn't make rev. wright or some other member a senator instead? * the 10,000 members of his church made him a senator? please tell me how many total voted in that election. |
|||
joe six pack.publicbored |
|||
|
can't we all just get along?
|
|||
Veelicious |
|||
|
Hmm...isn't that the boycotting board or something?
|
|||
finishthemoff |
|||
Mister Slippery wrote: After thinking long and hard about this, I agree with Mr. Slippery that McCain is all about McCain. We are fortunate that McCain's father was not a president during the Vietnam War. That would have been a disaster that even supprassed Tet Offensive. Also.. the article made an excellent point.. and he is the son of a former WW2 General (And McCain's father was an admiral) "For security reasons, the military will not disclose the locations in Iraq where Palin and Biden will serve. Pentagon officials and members of their units all say that the men will be treated like any other soldier or Marine. But retired Col. James Currie, a professor at the National Defense University, says that equal treatment could prove dangerous. "It simply wouldn't be fair to the other members of the unit to not give them special treatment, and in fact, get them out of there," Currie says. "Can you imagine the propaganda victory if al-Qaida or some organization over there were to injure, or kill or, heaven forbid, capture the son of a president or a vice president?" Only two American presidents have had a child fighting during wartime while they were in office. Four of Franklin Roosevelt's sons served in World War II, and Dwight Eisenhower's son John served in Korea. "My dad and I talked about it, and I told him I would not be captured," Eisenhower says. "I would do myself in before I was captured. That was the agreement between us." Although Eisenhower eventually retired as a one-star general in the Army, he now says his father's decision to leave him in combat was a mistake. "The military career of a young guy is not that important," he says. "What somebody could do to the burdens the president is carrying is just too much. It would have destroyed my military career if I had not gone to Korea, but I was not that important."" Dwight Eisenhower made it clear that he would resigned if his son is captured to avoid political downfall. With that being said, McCain is NOT a role model for captured prisoners. He sets a dangerous example to his own son. We do NOT need to provide Al Qaeda additional opportunities to make mockery of USA and hope that they will capture "princes" in their favors and declared major proganda and political victory. We don't need that. We cannot afford to have that. Who knows how McCain will reacts if that happens. Heaven forbid if we wants to see Palin in #%+#@ if this happens. I sure wouldn't. |
|||
springfeverish |
|||
|
There was nothing mysterious' about his move to Chi-town; he got offered a position at the University of Chicago, one of the most prestigious law schools
in the country. Talk about grasping at straws!
|
|||
youfist |
|||
ohboy wrote: Explain to me how that church got tax money...steered there by Barry Hussein after his election to the Senate? Or how his wifes hospital got a million bucks when he was elected? Or how he bought his house from a federally convicted slum lord (bribery I believe)? Obama has a shady past with shady lunatic fringe commies, anti-semites and criminals. Plus that waife-like effeminate fuck would rather talk to 200k Berliners than a handful of wounded US troops in GErmany. |
|||
joe sixpack |
|||
|
who's the cool new guy?
|
|||
Veelicious |
|||
|
I can't believe I understood that...
|
|||
Goosehead |
|||
memyselfandi wrote: |
|||
Veelicious |
|||
springfeverish wrote: I don't think that's why he went to Chicago. I know he worked for Sidley Austin for a while - where he met Michelle. That temporary job and Michelle are probably the reasons he settled in Chicago. Mystery solved! |
|||
buckitex |
|||
youfist wrote: You do realize that the policies of George W. Bush, the birth of the "faith based initiatives", allowed money to go to this church and many many others across the country. The money is not even that hard for them to obtain. I bought my house from the VA after it was forclosed on an iraq war vet. Does this make me shady? It must be hard only seeing one side of things....always. |
|||
Aunt Pappy |
|||
|
How many Joe Six Pack ghostie nics do we need?
|
|||
Gregoire |
|||
|
Chicago is mysterious -- and anybody from there should be thoroughly questioned and interrogated just for living there. So close to the Canadian
border, you must be anti-American!
Do you know who set the Great Chicago Fire of 1871? A cow in the barn of Mrs. O'Leary. O'Leary = O'bama I'm sorry, but that's enough suspicious monkey business that this deserves to spend several days in the news cycle in the midst of a financial meltdown. PLUS -- you know who else is from Chicago?
|
|||
Veelicious |
|||
joe sixpack wrote: Why did you change your name from the .publicbored one? |
|||
Aunt Pappy |
|||
|
Because he screwed up?
|
|||
Vegazguy |
|||
|
Keating Economics: the Making of a Financial Crisis" is a documentary that shows why John McCain's failed philosophy and poor judgment are a recipe
for deepening the economic crisis.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDofbll86dY |
|||
Veelicious |
|||
youfist wrote: Wow - someone did a number on you jack! It's like you are vomiting every smear email that was ever written. We've gone over most of this stuff before, but the German one is not quite so done to death. Do you ever fact check anything that you post? |
|||
Goosehead |
|||
|
@ AMAI, you say that 'you see no point' in reading economists that base their systems on 'coercion', i.e., taxes. Let me give you two reasons
to reconsider this:
1. You might realise that the Utopian economic consequences of such a (politically) principled committment are not as obvious or inevitable as many laissez-faire economists would have you believe. In other words, if you never read those who challenge libertarian orthodoxy, how would you ever know if their theories might be flawed? (but for you it doesn't matter because your founding assumption is political, not economic) 2. You should read divergent views: a) to get a sense of the perspective of the vast majority of people on this planet; b) to strengthen your own argument in debates like these. |
|||
Veelicious |
|||
Aunt Pappy wrote:But, we know already. We can't unsee it |
|||