| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 ArtieeLange |
|||
|
Posts: 195 (08/28/08 6:49 AM) |
Dr Will Hatch two point oh wrote:Depends on the challenge. Puzzles? Memory? Dexterity? Eating bugs? Yau Man was an overall good player...who got voted out by weaklings...which my system would prevent. Thanks again for unknowingly proving my point. |
||
|
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
|||
|
Posts: 4719 (08/28/08 10:48 AM) Registered user |
He got voted out at the fucking final 4, which you have no troubles with. The pre merge competitions in Fiji were mostly strength based, therefore Dreamz would
outperform. They would both be in the top half most of the time, but if it was between the two, Dreamz would win. You are deluded because you think all the
challenges are neutral, they usually favor someone. Even if the producers adopted your idea, it wouldn't be fair since certain people would be at a
disadvantage. Since it woud be more regulated, it would give the production crew even more more tho manipulate the show to their desires.
|
||
|
The Nick Brown |
|||
|
Posts: 3 (08/28/08 10:49 AM) |
This thread is the bomb
|
||
|
ArtieeLange |
|||
|
Posts: 198 (09/02/08 1:22 AM) |
Dr Will Hatch two point oh wrote:Yeah, someone who doesn't suck at something. You would understand, .but you suck at everything. |
||
|
Quiddity |
|||
|
Posts: 3481 (09/02/08 5:37 AM) Registered User |
You're quite the person to be talking about sucking, considering your wonderful performance in that CTS game where you were second person voted out. -_-
|
||
 Kitty Pryde1 |
|||
|
Posts: 5424 (09/02/08 5:56 AM) |
Yeah. And don't pull the cop out of "This isn't a real challenge because it's online." That would be just like the "variety"
of challenges they'd use under your system. Unless your system, like I all expect, consists solely of swimming to get puzzle pieces or digging to get
puzzle pieces, and then solving puzzles.
|
||
|
mfrimley |
|||
|
Posts: 812 (09/05/08 10:32 PM) |
What happened to Artiee? Is he non compos mentis from his last coke binge? |
||
|
ArtieeLange |
|||
|
Posts: 200 (09/06/08 2:27 AM) |
Kitty Pryde1 wrote:This isn't a real challenge because it's not attempting to be, its a bad joke about the thread-starts bad taste in media. But, yeah, you can't have a real challenge online. All you can really do is put forth an idea and repeatedly defend it against morons, the result of which is a large thread verifying it all. |
||
|
agentpf1101 |
|||
|
Posts: 296 (09/06/08 5:24 AM) |
aww man. i though this shit thread was dead and buried
|
||
|
TroubleInTampa |
|||
|
Posts: 3914 (09/06/08 6:55 AM) Registered user |
You must be new around here.
|
||
|
BobBob77 |
|||
|
Posts: 708 (09/06/08 8:50 AM) |
Just let this thread die, you delusional Ozzy fanboy.
|
||
|
Kitty Pryde1 |
|||
|
Posts: 5453 (09/06/08 10:15 AM) |
Why can't you have a challenge online? Plenty of people host ORGs with well thought-out challenges that reward intelligence or the ability to post fast
and accurately. It's no different than having a variety of challenges under your system...unless you're just a liar who uses that "variety"
crap to seem like you're more than just a troll, when in fact you only want physical challenges so ther strong men in the game win.
|
||
|
ArtieeLange |
|||
|
Posts: 201 (09/07/08 7:26 AM) |
Kitty Pryde1 wrote:You mean the ability to use google? 
There are valid "intelligence tests" online, many of which I have taken and scored in the top percentile. But you can't use them or their results in a "challenge online", dummy. And even if you could, the host could easily "cheat" by emailing the answers to her chubby friend beforehand. |
||
|
BobBob77 |
|||
|
Posts: 732 (09/07/08 9:33 AM) |
Let me just ask one question. If you went on Survivor and played with these rules, do you think you would win? If you played with your own system. |
||
|
Kitty Pryde1 |
|||
|
Posts: 5464 (09/07/08 10:16 AM) |
Jesus Christ, you are easily the dumbest load of shit I've ever seen in my many years of visiting online forums. Pretty much everyone thinks your system
is retarded and for the exact same reasons that you've NEVER made an effort to prove wrong. And now you're saying the host can cheat, so online
challenges don't count? Give me a fucking break. It makes me wonder what bullshit excuse you'd come out with when someone like Amanda or Parvati
beats you in a challenge under your system. "The host liked them more because they were hot, and I got distracted" perhaps? You're probably the
fattest sack of shit to have posted in this topic, and odds are you're too much of a pussy to apply for the show anyway, so why don't you shut the fuck
up and stop posting in this topic with your dellusional superiority complex.
|
||
|
Drboboosh2 |
|||
|
Posts: 9 (09/07/08 11:27 AM) |
But, yeah, you can't have a real challenge online.Artie, I'm hosting a new online survivor game. The challenges will be about starting stupid threads about a topic nobody cares about, and seeing how long you can keep it going, while making zero progress in convincing anyone to accept your idea, all while acting like you're the smartest person who ever lived and that your idea is absolutely flawless. The best part is, I'll even use your system in the game, so you'll be on the winning team for sure. |
||
|
parkervn |
|||
|
Posts: 112 (09/07/08 7:35 PM) |
ArtieeLange wrote:Wow, .you got him there. |
||
|
BobBob77 |
|||
|
Posts: 741 (09/07/08 9:09 PM) |
ArtieeLange wrote: Verifying it all? I must have missed the part where you verified it. You would think that if you had ever put out a decent argument there would have been someone who agreed. Have you noticed nobody has agreed with you? Maybe that is because nobody likes your idea, because it sucks. |
||
|
ThrowMeGabon |
|||
|
Posts: 8 (09/07/08 10:38 PM) |
This system worked for me!
It's like Real World/Road Rules Challenge, only SO MUCH BETTER! |
||
|
ArtieeLange |
|||
|
Posts: 202 (09/08/08 6:26 AM) |
BobBob77 wrote:Yes? A winner can't be predicted.
What can be predicted is that if I win, I earned it through competition and strategy, not luck or randomness like now. What can be predicted is that if I was voted off, it was through my own mistakes, not luck or randomness like now. What can be predicted is that you won't understand this explanation, because your brain is pea-sized. |
||
