An idea to improve Survivor so that weaklings dont comprise the finals

0 Kudo

Started By	Comment
SFC		#961	[-]
Posts: 452 (08/20/08 2:09 AM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Kitty Pryde1 wrote: So Artiee, with THESE eight people going to tribal council, who do you honestly believe would be voted out, and why?: Courtney, Jaime, Erik, Peih-Gee, Leslie, Dave, Todd, Amanda Reposted since you seemed to have missed it in Kitty's post
Kitty Pryde1		#962	[-]
Posts: 5366 (08/20/08 3:41 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	For fuck's sake, just ONCE, could you please drop the blatant troll act and answer a question when it's posed to you, Artiee? I asked you who would be voted out. Not for you to say that whoever gets voted out deserves it. Because under the current system, anyone who gets voted out deserves it too, because they didn't help their tribe win immunity, and they weren't good enough mentally or socially to get people to keep them around. Answer the question that was asked of you and stop dodging every intelligent point that pretty much everyone who has disagreed with you has made. You made the topic and yet absolutely no one, aside from a couple idiots who made one or two peoples a little while back and then disappeared, agrees with you. The burden of proof is on YOU to explain why your system makes any sense, and thus far, no one buys your condescending bullshit two-bit troll act. So for fuck's sake, just answer the question, pick a name, and explain your answer. You say your system weeds out the weak, then obviously your answer should be Courtney. Then explain how she would get voted out under the current system.
ArtieeLange		#963	[-]
Posts: 170 (08/20/08 4:28 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Kitty Pryde1 wrote: under the current system, anyone who gets voted out deserves it too, because they didn't help their tribe win immunity You mean like chet and kathy? See I have to use examples like that because you are too dumb to realize the statement you just made is false. Kitty Pryde1 wrote: your system weeds out the weak, then obviously your answer should be Courtney Obviously not. The answer is whoever in that group failed at making an alliance. The difference is that my system guarantees that those who do NOT fail at challenges get the immunity they deserve. I see I have to make all these examples for you because you are intellectually limited. Lets say you and the other losers in this thread like dr will are on a team with me, and we lose a challenge because you are fat and the others are disabled and stupid, and I do all the work but we still lose as a team. You and the losers bond as losers do, because numbers is all you have when you have no skill, and you vote me off. My only mistake was being unlucky enough to be stuck on a loser team. Under my system, my hard work during the challenge EARNS me the immunity I deserve, and I can watch you losers struggle amongst your loser selves to determine who gets off my island, deservedly. You hate my system, because you know exactly where you would be after every single challenge; on the Fail Team.
agentpf1101		#964	[-]
Posts: 212 (08/20/08 7:24 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	artie has a reality acceptance disorder. So many valid points from the opposition selectively ignored. If he chooses to respond to this post, i can already sorta pre-emp what he'll respond. "What valid points? Show me some PROOF of ONE valid point, everyone here cant BACKUP anything they say one bla bla bla bla bla - ((then hell end with a smiley face)) >>>" I think you dont even like your idea and this whole thread is just for attention, you like people responding because it gets you off - sexually Thats right you sexual deviant i think you cant get your rocks off unless someone is disagreeing with you, so you came up with the perfect plan: POST AN IDEA SO RIDICULOUS THAT ANY UNSUSPECTING PERSON WITH AT LEAST HALF A BRAIN WILL REALIZE HOW RIDICULOUSLY RETARDED YOU IDEA IS AND NATURALLY POST A RESPONSE DISAGREEING WITH IT. It was almost the perfect plan artie, almost, but know im here to let everyone know.... EVERYTIME YOU RESPOND IN THIS THREAD ARTIE MASTERBATES INTO A FOAM CUP AND USES THE COLLECTED CONTENTS TO POWER A CUM POWERED ORPHAN KILLING CYBORG, PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF EVERYTYHING HOLY, STOP POSTING!!! Or you can stop being a troll, and start responding to people properly.
ArtieeLange		#965	[-]
Posts: 172 (08/20/08 8:58 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	^ look at this freak, he writes a long multi-colored multi-font post about his fantasies but can't write one single valid point about the subject that was supposedly ignored. Not one.
oh ehm gee		#966	[-]
Posts: 1295 (08/20/08 9:12 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Lets say you and the other losers in this thread like dr will are on a team with me, and we lose a challenge because you are fat and the others are disabled and stupid, and I do all the work but we still lose as a team. You and the losers bond as losers do, because numbers is all you have when you have no skill, and you vote me off. My only mistake was being unlucky enough to be stuck on a loser team. But in that case, would there not be a second mistake: not recognizing and challenging the bond amongst the other players? Am I missing the part where the strong person was informed somehow (outside his or her own paranoia) that he or she was being targeted and did all that he or she could to prevent this from happening? Oh, and I hate orphans. Sorry.
ArtieeLange		#967	[-]
Posts: 173 (08/20/08 11:04 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	oh ehm gee wrote: But in that case, would there not be a second mistake: not recognizing and challenging the bond amongst the other players? "Hi losers! I challenge your loser-bond in order to not get voted out! Yes, I know I did all the work in the challenge. Yes, I know that is how lame this game is. Ready? Bond-Challenge!! Come on fatty, weaklings are weak! I promise not to vote you out lmao. No I was laughing at something else....Hey where did all the viewers go?"
SFC		#968	[-]
Posts: 453 (08/20/08 11:14 AM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Kitty Pryde1 wrote: So Artiee, with THESE eight people going to tribal council, who do you honestly believe would be voted out, and why?: Courtney, Jaime, Erik, Peih-Gee, Leslie, Dave, Todd, Amanda Reposted since you seemed to have missed it in Kitty's post Reposted (again) since you seemed to have missed it in Kitty's post
agentpf1101		#969	[-]
Posts: 215 (08/20/08 11:18 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Mt prediction of what arties response would be..... "What valid points? Show me some PROOF of ONE valid point, everyone here cant BACKUP anything they say one bla bla bla bla bla - ((then hell end with a smiley face)) >>>" Arties response..... ArtieeLange wrote: ^ look at this freak, he writes a long multi-colored multi-font post about his fantasies but can't write one single valid point about the subject that was supposedly ignored. Not one. somewhere in the world a plane just passed over your head dude
Kitty Pryde1		#970	[-]
Posts: 5367 (08/20/08 12:02 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	So let me get this straight... Me and Dr Will Hatch 2.0 are weak losers...and you're not... Me and Dr Will Hatch 2.0, being losers, make up the majority of a tribe despite being only two people... You would be voted off for being a massive challenge threat, and not because of your winning personality... Yeah, you're a fucking moron. The only thing your system would accomplish is that we'd have more people like Todd winning because they'd never get voted off from the losing team and they'd be able to claim they had much more to overcome than the generic alpha males in the finals. And then you'd just bitch about how the rules need to be changed again, probably so that an even smaller portion of "losers" go to tribal council so that the weakest players would be guaranteed to be eliminated early. You act as though strong players ONLY get voted out because weak players vote them out, and that's not true. Strong players are voted out either because a tribe can't stand their cocky attitude (basically why you'd be voted out, except using the term "strong" is a stretch), or because other strong players are afraid of them and don't want to compete against them. Jolanda was voted out because Steph didn't want to go up against her down the road. Peter was voted out because Hunter didn't want to deal with him down the road, and then Hunter was taken out because of Rob. So essentially, the weak survive in situations like Chet and Kathy's because the big strong muscleheads that your system helps are too stupid to make proper decisions. All your system does is make the strongest players that much more cocky and unbearable.
Ben Tucker		#971	[-]
Posts: 1516 (08/20/08 9:43 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Could I get the Sparknotes of this thread, please? =)
SFC		#972	[-]
Posts: 454 (08/20/08 10:25 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Ben Tucker wrote: Could I get the Sparknotes of this thread, please? =) 1.) Artie makes idea to stop "weaklings" from getting into the finals. 2.) Posters point out flaws in Artie's plan. 3.) Artie responds taking a sentence out of context, usually one with a typo, makes a joke about their intelligence and does a combination of and and then says that's why his system is better while really not backing anything he says up with facts and examples 4.) Posters find other fatal flaws in Artie's arguments, and uses facts and examples 5.) Repeat steps 3 and 4 for 48 pages.
BobBob77		#973	[-]
Posts: 402 (08/20/08 11:10 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	I love how he thinks for some reason that his idea being done would somehow increase the ratings by forty million people and bring the show all the way back to the popularity that it had at the beginning. IT'S NEVER GOING TO HAPPEN. Deal with it. If anything this idea would ruin the show. There have been so many players who were good at challenges, but were insanely boring. Imagine the entertainment of watching Ozzy and Joel as the final two. Wow, what a great season. And I guess that his response to this will make little to no sense, just like that answer he wrote a few posts back. It will probably use the word stupid a few times, convince no one person that he is right, and as many have pointed out, it will inevitably end with a which nobody will actually laugh at.
PagongSchlong		#974	[-]
Posts: 3909 (08/20/08 11:17 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Yeah, but Artiee is pretty funny though. That accounts for something.
Dr Will Hatch two point oh		#975	[-]
Posts: 4532 (08/20/08 11:54 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	PagongSchlong wrote: Yeah, but Artiee is pretty funny though. That accounts for something. Hes no fanofcoils. Theres just no dealing with the guy. I ask for evidence, he gives a childish insult. I ask for evidence again, he laughes like a retard. He's a hilarious troll, but suck my dick Art
ArtieeLange		#976	[-]
Posts: 174 (08/21/08 12:05 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	SFC wrote: Ben Tucker wrote: Could I get the Sparknotes of this thread, please? =) 1.) Artie makes idea to stop weaklings from getting into the finals. 2.) Posters point out "flaws" in Artie's plan. 3.) Artie responds to every single post, pointing out when their logic is flawed, laughs when they repeat their errors. 4.) Posters get hysterical, must defend their fellow weaklings to the death regardless of irrational statements. 5.) Repeat steps 3 and 4 for 48 pages. Fixed.
SFC		#977	[-]
Posts: 455 (08/21/08 1:02 AM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	ArtieeLange wrote: SFC wrote: Ben Tucker wrote: Could I get the Sparknotes of this thread, please? =) 1.) Artie makes idea to stop weaklings from getting into the finals. 2.) Posters point out "flaws" in Artie's plan. 3.) Artie responds to every single post, pointing out when their logic is flawed, laughs when they repeat their errors. 4.) Posters get hysterical, must defend their fellow weaklings to the death regardless of irrational statements. 5.) Repeat steps 3 and 4 for 48 pages. Fixed. Highlighted False Statements
Ben Tucker		#978	[-]
Posts: 1517 (08/21/08 3:21 AM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	If the contestant makes it to the end, they really aren't weak, are they? ...or has that been already asked? But yeah, it does sound like a dumb idea...
ArtieeLange		#979	[-]
Posts: 176 (08/21/08 4:12 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	Ben Tucker wrote: If the contestant makes it to the end, they really aren't weak, are they? Weak and lucky, stupid. Weak and lucky.
agentpf1101		#980	[-]
Posts: 222 (08/21/08 7:23 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts Message Connection Block Invite	SFC wrote: Ben Tucker wrote: Could I get the Sparknotes of this thread, please? =) 1.) Artie makes idea to stop "weaklings" from getting into the finals. 2.) Posters point out flaws in Artie's plan. 3.) Artie responds taking a sentence out of context, usually one with a typo, makes a joke about their intelligence and does a combination of and and then says that's why his system is better while really not backing anything he says up with facts and examples 4.) Posters find other fatal flaws in Artie's arguments, and uses facts and examples 5.) Repeat steps 3 and 4 for 48 pages. nail on the head

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Yuku free message boards

An idea to improve Survivor so that weaklings dont comprise the finals

Quick Reply