rugslug wrote:
McCain has changed position on topics OVER HIS 30 YEAR CAREER. Flip/Flopbama has changed his positions on Iraq, abortion, Supreme Court judges, FISA, etc. OVER ONE MONTH. See the difference? Flip/flopbama shows that he doesn't transcend anything but is just the same old double talking politician the Dems have been forcing on the country for years.
Can right wingers resist the temptation to use talking points, group think and jingo speak?
The word I hear is that Obama is hitting the flip switch like some hopped up huff monkey who can't make up his mind.
McContradiction
by Robert Gordon and James Kvaal
What's worse than flip-flopping? Consistently promising two opposing goals at the same time
Post Date Wednesday, July 09, 2008
John McCain's fantastical pledge on Monday to balance the budget by 2013 through massive tax cuts and unidentified budget reductions deserved the bad reviews it received. But the most unfortunate element of his incoherent promise is that it's representative of his policy agenda these days. While the McCain campaign is trying to paint Barack Obama as a flip-flopper, the Arizona Republican is making diametrically opposed policy promises to different audiences at the same time. The contradictions are often in the details, but their obscurity is evidence of the campaign's cynicism.
Take McCain's ambitious health care plan. It would give every family a $5,000 health insurance tax credit at a cost of $3.6 trillion, by his campaign's own account. Despite its size, McCain aides have said, repeatedly, that McCain's health care proposal has no net cost. That's because it would tax workers' health benefits, which the Joint Committee on Taxation agrees will raise $3.6 trillion (in its analysis of the Bush proposal that served as the model for McCain's plan). Taxing health benefits solves the budget problem, but it creates another: It raises taxes on tens of millions of middle-class families, according to a Center for American Progress Action Fund report one of us co-authored
continued at:
The New Republic













