Ya, we understand you're a retard, and agree your idea sux. Notice you're not talking about HK anymore. Could it be because in the F2 you have a woman
who only get a job in McDonalds, shooting down your idea how fair their system is, and is what Survivor needs.
0 Kudo
- Survivor Sucks
- Lions, Tigers, Survivors - Oh My!
- Survivor Spoilers
- MESS Hall Tribal Council
- MESS Hall Archive
- Survivor Speculation
- Survivor 20+
- The Amazing Race
- Big Brother
- Big Brother - PAST SEASONS
- The Apprentice
- American Idol
- American Idol PAST SEASONS
- The Mole
- Lost
- Other Shows That Suck
- Off Topic
- Clubs That Suck. No, Really.
- The Dump
- Monster Island
- Purgatory
- FAQ
- In Memory, 9/11/01
An idea to improve Survivor so that weaklings dont comprise the finals
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 doc |
|||
|
Posts: 166 (07/02/08 10:07 PM) |
|
||
|
getting real |
|||
|
Posts: 1230 (07/03/08 1:57 AM) Registered User |
Come to NYC, I would snap your arm off, beat you up with your own arm, and then turn to the crowd of onlookers "In real life, there are clear winners, and clear losers (here I would point at you, using your own arm). In "Survivor", that loser (points to the sobbing, bloody mess that is you) could bring along another group of people, resulting in an unfair competition n the 'team' portion of the game. That weakling (points) could outlast me. Are there any questions?Just one. When do you get out of prison? |
||
|
tubecam |
|||
|
Posts: 133 (07/03/08 7:33 AM) |
ArtieeLange1 wrote: Lucky coincidence, I live in NYC. I will be sure to have the rest of my rugby team be amoung the onlooking crowd, as I am arm wrestling champ on my rugby
club.
|
||
|
Kitty Pryde1 |
|||
|
Posts: 5003 (07/03/08 12:18 PM) |
Artiee, either give examples of your idea or shut the fuck up. Oh right, you can't, because in order to continue your facade of being fair to all players,
you insist that there will be challenges that ANYONE can win. Meanwhile, you continually state that someone like Chet would always go home early under your
rules. Given how weak you consider Chet, you have to admit that he more than likely would never win a challenge. And under your system, someone who sucks at
challenges is good to have around, because it means one less person to compete against, and thus no one in their right mind would vote against Chet under any
circumstances. The only way you'd take him out of the game is if he got injured again.
|
||
|
Green Coffee |
|||
|
Posts: 82 (07/03/08 1:31 PM) Registered user |
Keep on feeding the troll.
Fucking idiots. |
||
|
ArtieeLange1 |
|||
|
Posts: 120 (07/03/08 6:58 PM) |
Kitty Pryde1 wrote: He doesn't have to win, dummy. He only has to get into the top half.
|
||
|
SFC |
|||
|
Posts: 388 (07/03/08 7:44 PM) Registered user |
ArtieeLange1 wrote: Which you have to admit would still be hard for him to do |
||
|
doc |
|||
|
Posts: 168 (07/03/08 7:57 PM) |
SFC wrote: Even if he did, no big deal, He'd have to being in the winner's half alot before He's considered a threat, So every time he's in the loser's half, he's safe. He makes F2 against someone like Ozzy, every season is like that, so how does that help ratings? |
||
|
SFC |
|||
|
Posts: 389 (07/03/08 8:27 PM) Registered user |
doc wrote: I don't think Ozzy would get anywhere near the Final 2 under Artie's system, first time he finishes in the bottom half, he would be voted out
|
||
|
ArtieeLange1 |
|||
|
Posts: 121 (07/04/08 4:13 AM) |
SFC wrote: Good. Then he will try harder and succeed, or he will fail, be vulnerable and culled, while those who tried harder successfully are safe. End result? More
entertaining.
|
||
|
ArtieeLange1 |
|||
|
Posts: 122 (07/04/08 4:21 AM) |
I don't think Ozzy would get anywhere near the Final 2 under Artie's system, first time he finishes in the bottom half, he would be voted out Thank you, another perfect example of how those who do not support my system are simply too dim to understand it. I love it. Ready? You are using Ozzy as an example, moronically, since everyone already knows Ozzy is a threat. 16 new players, you will not be able to identify a threat, since half the players will be winners each time. By the time any threat is known, it is well
into the game, where a) nearly everyone would have at least won once, making everyone a "minor threat" and b) all players will have had a chance to
strategize.
|
||
|
doc |
|||
|
Posts: 169 (07/04/08 8:00 AM) |
You're crazy if you think it would take a long time to recognize Ozzy as a threat. Maybe if he held back some in the challenges, but no way someone like
Ozzy is holding back. And this is only because he's stronger than he looks. How hard would it be to see James as a threat? Or Alicia? But it's good
you finally see how strong players will be a target when they slip to the losers group. Keep thinking that way, maybe after 30 more pages you'll
understand how much your system sucks, something everyone else got with your first post.
|
||
|
SFC |
|||
|
Posts: 390 (07/04/08 10:24 AM) Registered user |
ArtieeLange1 wrote: It just takes one bad challenge, if Ozzy gets a question wrong, trips, misses a jump, to get him in the bottom half. In your system here is how a conversation would go if both Chet and Ozzy were in the losing tribe. Person A: Want to vote off Chet? Person B: Chet? Fuck no. He can barely finish above last place. We need to vote Ozzy* off, that guy has been in the top 3 of every challenge so far. Person A: Makes sense, maybe if he goes we can get into the winners half next time? * Insert any Challenge threat. |
||
|
ArtieeLange1 |
|||
|
Posts: 123 (07/04/08 10:32 AM) |
doc wrote: Why wouldn't he hold back, dummy? He only has to get into the top half. He won't need to dominate the physical challenges by choice, and he
won't dominate the mental-type challenges, not by choice.
There will be no "threats". And even if you think there will be, they will be safe until THEY screw up, in a challenge and in socializing.
You can't even count on how many levels this beats the current system.
|
||
|
SFC |
|||
|
Posts: 391 (07/04/08 10:56 AM) Registered user |
To which people would take not of his high placings and them making him a threat. Like I said all it takes is for one mistake to land them in the bottom half, no one could ever do a perfect run in those conditions. Yes there will always be threats, and they are easily identifiable, let's play a game "IDENTIFY THE THREAT" Ozzy-Threat James-Threat Chet-Not A Threat Kathy-Not A Threat Jason-Threat Courtney-Not A Threat Let's try and count the ways your system beats the current system 1.)................. Damn, I've got nothing, anyone else have an idea? |
||
|
doc |
|||
|
Posts: 170 (07/04/08 12:55 PM) |
ArtieeLange1 wrote: I gotta spell this out for you? It's called ego. Players like Ozzy, Boston Rob, Tom and Terry never sit out challenges, will always want to do a tie break or a critical part of a challenge. They have to be the hero, in individual challenges they have to be number 1. Rob wouldn't even give the meaningless FC to Amber If there's 20 players, they only need to get into the top 10. They will always go for first. Second to them is as good as a being in the losers group. Look at the competition this season between Ozzy and Jason. Ya, if they played smart they wouldn't be seen as a threat as fast. Also it's just not how they do in challenges, but how they are around camp, climbing coconut trees like it's nothing. Ego even hits the smarter players. Look at Michele in Pearl Islands at the eating Challenge. Still none. Okay I'll give you 1, You'll Give EPMB a good laugh. Let's check out his bank account vs. yours. I think he knows what he's doing. |
||
|
ArtieeLange1 |
|||
|
Posts: 124 (07/04/08 12:55 PM) |
SFC wrote:There is no "them", dummy. 1) Challenges are not only physical. 2) Players no longer have to dominate, but simply reach the top half. SFC wrote: 1).......You just proved how the current system easily identifies threats 2) I already proved how the current system easily votes off threats. 3) My system solves both those problems. 4)The day someone of your capacity supports my system is the day I start to doubt it.
4) And now its time to laugh. |
||
|
ArtieeLange1 |
|||
|
Posts: 125 (07/04/08 1:05 PM) |
doc wrote: Doc? You really need to stop with these posts, its become increasingly difficult to figure out which one of you here is the dumbest. Ready?
They don't have to win to get immunity, only get in the top half. Using your pseudo-psychological terminology, any player who has "ego" and needs to "be a hero" and dominate to first place when don't have to? You don't recognize it because you're pea-brained, but that would be fucking moronic, and morons getting through in this game is just what my system is designed to prevent. And now its time laugh again at how these dopes against my system keep proving why its better. |
||
|
getting real |
|||
|
Posts: 1236 (07/04/08 4:04 PM) Registered User |
Word just in. MB has caved in. The kingdom is yours.
|
||
|
SFC |
|||
|
Posts: 392 (07/04/08 4:51 PM) Registered user |
ArtieeLange1 wrote: 1.) No, I use something called "The Power of Observation". Just by looking at a picture of them you can say "Oh, they are going to be good" or "They are going to suck in challenges" 2.) No You haven't, please show us, give examples. 3.) You can't fix it if it isn't broken. 4.) Well, you support it so there is kind of a little paradox 4.) There is supposed to be a 5 there dumbass. |
||
- Survivor Sucks
- Lions, Tigers, Survivors - Oh My!
- Survivor Spoilers
- MESS Hall Tribal Council
- MESS Hall Archive
- Survivor Speculation
- Survivor 20+
- The Amazing Race
- Big Brother
- Big Brother - PAST SEASONS
- The Apprentice
- American Idol
- American Idol PAST SEASONS
- The Mole
- Lost
- Other Shows That Suck
- Off Topic
- Clubs That Suck. No, Really.
- The Dump
- Monster Island
- Purgatory
- FAQ
- In Memory, 9/11/01
