| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Kitty Pryde1 |
|||
|
OMG, I really don't think he was being sarcastic, otherwise he wouldn't even be using Steph as an example. He's not smart enough to be that
clever.
|
|||
doc |
|||
|
I don't see sarcasm there because of this sentence "Again, proving the game fails". He sounds as serious as he had for 30 pages that the strong
are early boots. I think it was an honest mistake, just a pretty big 1.Now it makes sense why he doesn't want to give examples , because he doesn't
know shit. My guess he started watching Fiji, was happy when Earl won, then had a problem when Todd won China and Parv won Micronesia. He expected a more
physical game like his beloved RW/RR, now he wants to change Survivor.
|
|||
m0t0 maj1 |
|||
|
Sarcasm or not:
HIS IDEA STILL SUCKS!!! |
|||
ArtieeLange |
|||
doc wrote: I've seen every episode of every season. As others have already said, the game now is less about "surviving" (food, water, fire,
hunting,fishing, shelters, etc) because the producers consider those aspects "old".
Removing those aspects results in a dull game with brain-dead wimps. Anyone who watches the show knows the strategy to bond with losers and vote off
threats, using the team-system to your advantage in order to do so. Any viewer can see the results of this "strategy" in the weak finalists. Todd is
not a Survivor. Todd is an elf, the gayest creature possible. Parvati is not a Survivor. Parvati walked into the wrong casting studio and landed on Survivor
instead of where she planned, a first-time porno shoot. When the host can beat up a "Survivor" winner, the game fails. Now go count how many winners
can take Jeff Probst in a fight.
Last Edited By: ArtieeLange
06/22/08 3:38 AM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
oh ehm gee |
|||
When the host can beat up a "Survivor" winner, the game fails. Now go count how many winners can take Jeff Probst in a fight. So you're basically saying women winning makes the game fail? Sexist much? |
|||
doc |
|||
|
I think Sandea and Parv could take him.
And back when the game was more primal in S1-S4, Richard and V were winners, Neleh and KJ were runner ups, and in the F6 you had Coleen, Amber, Elisabeth, Kim P, Teresa, and Kathy V O. So the game changes by giving better rewards, etc, but stays pretty much the same. |
|||
ArtieeLange |
|||
oh ehm gee wrote: When the male host can beat up a male "Survivor" winner, the game fails. That brings up another point why RW/RR is better; they separate the guys from the girls in the vote-off competitions. So then I will say when a female RW/RR winner can beat up a female Survivor winner, the game fails. doc wrote:Parv spent her time on a show called Survivor sun-bathing. The game sucks. You suck. Just because you have posters of her hanging over your bed doesn't mean she did anything great. |
|||
doc |
|||
|
I think it's really odd, that being able to beat up Probst is how you judge players.
She's a boxer, I think she can take care of herself. No posters over my bed, but wondering what Survivor studs are hanging over your bed. |
|||
ArtieeLange |
|||
doc wrote: That should be part of the game, Surviving a Jeff Probst attack, it would weed out pussies like you.
doc wrote: Foxy-boxing is not a sport.
|
|||
doc |
|||
|
Before you were praising Eliza. Now you want to kick her out. Because she's pretty small, like Parvati, so unless she can use her puzzle solving ability or
death rays fire out of her alien eyes, my money is on Jeff.
|
|||
ArtieeLange |
|||
doc wrote: 1) Don't ever compare Eliza to Parvati again.
2) I explained any male winner who could be beaten up by Probst the host is not a Survivor. 3) Then I said Survivor could take a hint from RW/RR which makes the end challenges guy vs guy, and girl vs girl.
Survivor could have a male AND female winner - Survivors. Each suited to differed qualities. Or one brawn and one brain Survivor. Then you can eliminate the semi-permanent teams without bitching that the weaker and the older won't have a chance...since thats why the team part exists anyway. I am full of ideas, doc, whereas youre just full of shit. |
|||
doc |
|||
|
Wow , you're having a mental meltdown.
Five foot one Parv sucks, because she can't beat up Probst, even though it's only important that the guys are able to beat him up. And now you want 2 winners, even thgough the title is SOUL survivor, Soul means 1. And the reason is because the women aren't strong enough to take on the guys and the guys can't match the women in the smarts department. |
|||
goose |
|||
|
doc wrote:
And now you want 2 winners, even thgough the title is SOUL survivor, Soul means 1. SOUL |
|||
ArtieeLange |
|||
doc wrote: Right.
doc wrote: Wrong. She sucks because she is weak stupid and kinda dull.
doc wrote: It's an idea, this way you can separate the challenges and have a physical winner and intellectual winner...like The Professor on Gilligans Island, At
the very least, this will guarantee two worthy winners, instead of one overall winner who fails at both physical AND intellectual. And now its time to laugh:
doc wrote: |
|||
oh ehm gee |
|||
ArtieeLange wrote:No, that was time to laugh. Given that you know oh so much about the television industry, I'm sure you're just posting that for laffos, since giving away a second million is fairly cost-ineffective in terms of improving ratings/getting more advertisers/making a profit. Or else you plan on giving away $500 grand each, which would make it less worth competing for (if Survivor were only for $500 grand, I'd totally do BB in a heartbeat instead). Two other things: 1) Parvati sucks because she enjoys it. and 2) The fact that you didn't make a Vee joke at "Soul Survivor" makes me suspect that you have watched *points* from the beginning. |
|||
ArtieeLange |
|||
oh ehm gee wrote: RW/RR winners get around 10% of that and they compete their asses off.
oh ehm gee wrote: If you knew about the tv industry, you would know that networks spend more than that paying sitcom actors...per
episode.
oh ehm gee wrote: >
|
|||
oh ehm gee |
|||
RW/RR winners also get to compete in multiple challenges - would you like to cut the prize down to 50K and allow for past players to compete in every season (whether it be a full ASS or new vs. old), because it will pretty much become watching Rupert, Amanda and Mariano lose over and over. Additionally, few of those people have jobs other than doing challenges and speaking in colleges. If you knew about the tv industry, you would know that networks spend more than that paying sitcom actors...per episode. I most certainly did, but thanks. Not to mention, most sitcom actors that can afford to pay their actors that much probably have decent ratings, making it a worthwhile expense. It would be completely different to try and fix a sinking ship (as you feel Survivor has become) by trying to add another million dollars to it when there are cheaper alternatives (better casting). And the Vee comment was meant to be a joke. I'm sorry that you felt the need to make it in to some random comparison when it was just me making the easy joke you wouldn't go for based upon the events of that season (srsly, my mom stopped watching after ASS and she remembers how religious Vee was). FWIW Vee pwning Neleh = Coral pwning Holly in BOTS.
Last Edited By: oh ehm gee
06/24/08 7:06 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
doc |
|||
|
OMG, I made a mistake in grammar. That's never happens in Sucks. How can I live with myself? I'd like some advice, Artie. How do you live with
being such a dipshit you can't the simple concept that your system would make the strong even bigger targets? Wonder why RR/RW has lower prizes than
Survivor? Could it be because Survivor is top 20 show, and RR/RW is on MTV? Probably. Survivors earn their money. Ami's almost recovered from 2 torn
ligaments in her leg that didn't take her out of the game. Dehydration, malnutrition, Parasites, and they're still standing 10 hours on a pole or
something. They are truly amazing people, they completely have my respect (except for Osten) for the shit they go through. And then some want to go again,
some for a third time. Where do RW/RR contestants live and what do they eat?
|
|||
ArtieeLange |
|||
oh ehm gee wrote: Which has nothing to do with the level they compete at (or the level they are tested) during each challenge and each season.
oh ehm gee wrote: I know, I just needed an excuse to post Corals pic for poor lil doc.
|
|||
XXWildcat |
Counter Proposal | ||
|
I make a counter proposal that the people who created the Wipeout obstacle courses be hired by Survivor and bring a lot more humor to challenges. I laffed my
ass off at these idiots...............unlike I did at this thread and it's length.
|
|||