Yuku free message boards

phoenixtobootcamp wrote:

---

People will always see what they want to see. I think poor Chet was so humiliated that he begged his tribe to vote him out. I almost thought he was making shit up with the heel injury and whatnot just to look pathetic enough.

Although it is always up to the contestant to leave on their own discretion, I know for a fact that if Chet was in any immediate (life threatening) danger they would've medivac'ed him out. He wouldn't have waited till the tribal council to save face. The whole glorifying from his "fans" is sorta amusing. hehe

Those ass-kissers are the same fools who choose the current system over mine, precisely because they are losers who identify with losers like Chet and they know the current system enables losers to latch on and outnumber.

I'm glad my thread exposed them. :-)

ImANewUser wrote:

---

HOW would your system, if enacted upon China/Micronesia, affect the results?

The players who win the challenge will win immunity and will not get voted off. Asking for examples is irrelevant since unlike certain ass-kissers around here, I am unbiased and my system is completely based on merit; Whoever competes and succeeds gets and deserves immunity.

Let me clear it up since I can sense a giant question mark above your head, and possibly a little drooling.

Under the current system, what happens after the merge seems fair and equal and out of that group, whoever wins seems to have deserved to win. The problem is that before the merge, the game is about outnumbering on your own "team" so it is not the best players that advance. And once they do, they already have their pre-merge alliances that were formed under an unfair half-assed "team" system.

Under my system, every challenge will rank the players based on merit. Only the worst will be eligible to be voted off. It doesn't matter what they do or plan, one of them will be voted off. This not only reflects what a Survivor should be, but real life as well; Winners get rewarded, losers get penalized. This is the type of system which pains loser viewers, who don't want to see other losers suffer as they do in their real life. So they rail against it as "unfair" or try to use their lil brains to anticipate how it would fail,like here:
http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/reply/3004760/t/-idea--improve-Survivor---weaklings-dont-comprise--finals.html#reply-3004760

That clown re-posted his own question because they thought it was so brilliant, I dismissed it in two lines, and then they ignore my response. Result? Owned.