| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
|||
|
Posts: 3516 (05/11/08 9:14 PM) Registered user |
Even if it was a final 3, Cirie probobly wouldn't have won.If she makes it to f3,Parvati could give a very convincing argument that her past attempt on
Survivor has nothing to do with her current stint, which was far more of a coattail ride then last time. Or they simply could of voted her out at f4
|
||
snalpoacks |
|||
|
Posts: 611 (05/11/08 9:17 PM) Stranger with benefits
|
Fucking A. When they said it would be final 2 I hit myself for wishing they'd go back to Final 2 so many times.
Cirie was robbed. |
||
growsonwalls |
|||
|
I like the F2 format better, it's just a better game format. On the other hand, I don't think someone like Cirie can EVER win Survivor. A great social
player/strategist that can never win challenges when she needs to win them will always have a heartbreaking finish. She actually could have won the final
immunity, but again, it wasn't meant to be.
|
|||
Thailandsurvivor |
|||
growsonwalls wrote: She votes with Natalie, and she is automatically in the finals. |
|||
sunnfllower |
Mark Burnett is one clever man | ||
|
So long Cirie. You got alot more than you deserved & CBS apparently feels the same way!
|
|||
boredmale |
|||
|
I am actually happy there wasn't a final 3. I don't think Amanda deserved to win, but it probably would have been a case that Pav and Cirie would
split the votes and Amanda would sneak through and win(i am guessing the vote would be something like 3-2-2)
|
|||
Loony Moonie |
|||
|
That change of plans was fuckin' evil. Cirie was robbed.
|
|||
AssWaffle |
|||
|
cirie got fucked by the one thing she didn't do all season. win challenges..serves that bitch right...
|
|||
pinkdolphin |
|||
|
They need to switch it up like that so people don't get lazy (or play under the radar) and expect everyone else to do the dirty work for them. She needed
to win the challange and didn't.
|
|||
Krusty001 |
|||
|
Sweet! Cirie doesn't make it to FTC. Otherwise, she could very well have won it all.
|
|||
aboutbreakingrules |
|||
AssWaffle wrote: There's no room in this contest for anyone who wants a fair fight. If you're not willing to adapt to whatever is thrown at you, too bad. It's moment to moment, second to second, instant to instant, breath to breath. Be ready to change absolutely everything on an instant's notice without breaking anything or someone else will be the Sole Survivor. Outwit, outplay, outlast. All's fair in love and challenges. |
|||
kmill |
|||
|
Um, if Survivor were KNOWN for having an unpredictable finale... then sure, it'd be fine. But 12 seasons of a F2 followed by 3 F3s which gave winners that
fans LOVED as well as the jury starting at the appropriate time for a F3, I fail to see how ANYONE could have anticipated the F2.
|
|||
willsucks402 |
|||
Dr Will Hatch two point oh wrote: Eliza begs to differ |
|||
Survivor Boy |
|||
|
Yep Cirie got screwed, again.. at least it wasn't by fire this time... just Mark Burnett.
|
|||
solesurvivor01 |
|||
|
^You mean she got screwed over by EPMB again, right? After all, it was moreso the overpowered HII which caused her downfall last time than the fire challenge.
|
|||
Juggler 8o8 |
|||
|
I wonder if they changed it to F2 after hearing so many people complaining about it like here
|
|||
Kathy Fan 2 |
|||
|
To whoever says you need to win challenges in order to be a good Survivor player - WTF?
Tina? (Yes, I know she DID win, but...how often? And compared to Colby? AND she didn't win the F3 IC, so...) Sandra? Vecepia? Cirie didn't need to win challenges because as far as she knew it was a final 3. Challenges aren't important. If they were, do you think she'd have kept Parvati and Amanda around and not sided with Natalie, Alexis & Erik? Come on. |
|||
yosimtesam |
|||
|
^i dont know if siding with erick, alexis, and nat would of gotten cirie any further. I think she still would of needed to win the last final 3 challange as i
dont think any of those 3 would have taken her to f2; and, nat, alexis, or erick probably would of won against cirie. I do agree you do not need to win
challenges in order to be a good survivor...cirie is proof of this.
|
|||
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
|||
|
Posts: 3558 (05/14/08 7:25 AM) Registered user |
willsucks402 wrote: Parvati probably had a great speech prepared.If Cirie won,it would be an injustice because all she relied on was her past reputation |
||
sunnfllower |
Hey snalpoacks | ||
Hit yourself again will ya? Still won't change the fact that the cow ended up on the jury. |
|||