New Poll
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
urrout |
|||
|
He said F2 or F3 and F3 or F2 in several interviews. It wasn't a slip.
|
|||
Jacare15 |
|||
|
I think that's the reason why many believe it to be a Final 2. Why else would he be saying Final 3 or 2 when there hasn't been a final two since Exile
Island?
|
|||
Relynn |
|||
ProbstFan123 wrote: But the problem is what if the editing is more long season, reveal. People are always looking to know who wins after the first episode, but what if the
winner isn't the type of person who jumps out at the first episode.. Or is the type of person who sits back and waits and strikes later. What if the
editing decides to show this? And well unlike others, the winner is also someone unlikely to brag to the camera. I think the editing can tell us, but I think
sometimes we should give the editors more than just one episode to tell us the story.
|
|||
ProbstFan123 |
|||
but what if the winner isn't the type of person who jumps out at the first episode.. Or is the type of person who sits back and waits and strikes later.Yes, but even then how can you pick out Amanda as the winner in that scenario as opposed to Alexis, James, Erik, or even Natalie? Just based on editing, there's nothing that distinguishes Amanda from any of the others. Anyone who says there were editing clues pointing to a Danni win is just using hindsight. As for "slow and steady", I think that ship sailed when Amanda started humping Ozzy on Day 2. If anything that quote would point to a Cirie win. |
|||
Jacare15 |
|||
|
Amanda's win would be extremely baffling. The only thing she has going for her would be having a previous season to be remembered for because if this were
a bunch of newbs and someone like Amanda won after being so UTR/MOR for 75% of the season... there would basically be no more reasons for edgic.
|
|||
urrout |
|||
Jacare15 wrote: Maybe just playing with us after reading the forums. There is supposed to be more twists and ends with a bang though.
|
|||
Jacare15 |
|||
|
Sure can, but Jason never seemed the smartest.
|
|||
Relynn |
|||
ProbstFan123 wrote: What does "slow and steady as response to the game" necessarily have to do with Amanda making out with Ozzy. So she made out with Ozzy, it's
not like she'd be the first one targeted in that group. We have seen Amanda lay back for a long time, watch, and let others take the lead. THAT'S
SLOW AND STEADY.
|
|||
ProbstFan123 |
|||
|
If there were any editing clues pointing to an Amanda win, people would have picked up on them before the
Parvati/Amanda rumors started. Amanda wasn't even on the radar until that spoiler came out.
If there was an Erik/Natalie final 2 spoiler, people would be pointing out every little scene featuring the two of them and arguing why it was obvious all along. It's all hindsight and doesn't mean crap. Amanda may very well win, but it has nothing to do with editing. |
|||
chad6 |
|||
|
^^^ I'm confused when you said "it has nothing to do with editing". I'm assuming you mean that Amanda's win could not be predicted by
editing?
|
|||
Katy Carney |
|||
|
Do you really believe she will win Relynn or do you just want her to?
|
|||
Relynn |
|||
ProbstFan123 wrote: Okay, I didn't think I'm really arguing that Amanda wins, I disagreed with everyone writing her off, but she hasn't been shown a lot until recently. However, I'm not just suggesting Amanda wins because of the spoiler. I'm also suggesting it because of how Amanda has been edited lately. As I mentioned earlier, Amanda is getting the "underdog" edit, when she's still in the main alliance. Plus, coupled with the words for this future episode about a former power player, turned into the most desperate one of all, who finds something that "could change the course of the game." Those are classic Survivor words that indicate something about the person. So it's not just the spoiler, but also how the editing has been treating Amanda as of late. |
|||
ProbstFan123 |
|||
|
She has been getting more screentime lately, no doubt. But so has Natalie.
So did Amanda at this time last season. |
|||
LKMOSCAR |
|||
|
Everyone should be getting more screen time with less people.
|
|||
Relynn |
|||
LKMOSCAR wrote: But Amanda a lot of screen time in the merge episode, and when you think about it she got screen time too when the tribal switch happened. Amanda had a much bigger merge episode than let's say Cirie. And we still don't have a whole lot of insight into let's say how Alexis feels about her alliances. (And yeah Natalie got this big episode but it's literally the only strategic confessional Natalie got, and it made everyone hate her. And it wasn't even a long term one either.) |
|||
ProbstFan123 |
|||
|
Parvati had a lot of screentime in the merge episode too, if you're going to use that criteria. She was also one of the stars of episode 1.
The two most important episodes in the season. Parvati has had all of these little moments where she was featured when she didn't need to be. Even her "Thank you, Jeff!" when she was introduced in episode 1. |
|||
LKMOSCAR |
|||
|
So episodes 2-7 don't count?
|
|||
Katy Carney |
|||
|
Parvati also has a winner quote like every episode. Unless Amanda is the new Amber, which I suppose is possible but not likely considering the response she
got, then Amanda is just an accessory to everyone elses game. Parvati's, Cirie's, Ozzy's...Amanda is just part of all of their game.
|
|||
urrout |
|||
|
Isn't it kind of late in the season to be saying "game on"? I don't see an underdog edit with Amanda. I thought she looked stupid in the
confessional. She's heard P. lie, knows she intends to backstab O/J and makes an alliance with A/N, etc. and then is surprised by the Ozzy boot? What is
she doing there?
|
|||
LKMOSCAR |
|||
|
Anyone but me.
|
|||