Edgic has been successful in picking two of the last Four winners through editing and logic prior to the merge (JennaM and Sandra). In All-Stars, the consensus was Amber was edited for second place so we were off by 1 with most picking Jenna Lewis. In S9 most thought Scout would have the storybook ending. So, two firsts and two thirds are not too shabby based solely on the editing. The theory is based on the assumption that Mark Burnett edits the show each season in a similar fashion, the winner will have some similarities to past winners editing patterns.
Ill attempt to explain Edgic for anyone new who wants to jump on board. We devote this thread to try and pick the winner (hopefully by or before the merge). We look at the editing player by player and apply logic from past editing patterns or observations about what we have been shown.
Here is what we do to collect data for each episode:
After watching each episode posters rate the players:
Step 1:
Ratings: OTT, CP, MOR, UTR and INV
OTT (over the top)
CP (complex personality)
MOR (middle of the road)
UTR (under the radar)
INV (Invisible)
Step 2:
Tone: NN, N, nothing, P, PP (Rate players from Really Negative to Really Positive)
Step 3:
Visibility: 1-5 (From 1 or low visibility to 5 or high visibility)
Below in Warriors post are the comprehensive guidelines we use.
Below in 9RedWing19s post are the charts for past players. There is also a separate thread called Edgic Charts that has more of the past seasons data.
This thead has always been flame-free and we also strive to keep it spoiler-free. That should not change for this season. New posters are welcomed and encouraged. New ideas and fresh eyes are good for Edgic.
KQ
p.s. I would ask people avoid posting until Warrior and RW get their info in, so their stuff can be on page one.





















