This is Why Women Can't Win Survivor. http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/59420/t/This-is-Why-Women-Can-t-Win-Survivor-.html en-us Copyright 2006, Yuku feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster) webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster) Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:42:58 GMT Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:33:54 GMT Yuku Feeds 1.0 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Yuku http://static.yuku.com//feed/bypass/images/button-yuku.png http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/59420/t/This-is-Why-Women-Can-t-Win-Survivor-.html Yuku - free hosted forums and profiles 88 31 {pics-1.1 "http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html" l gen true for "http://yuku.com" r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) "http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html" l gen true for "http://yuku.com" r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 )) Search Search Domain q http://yuku.com/search/direct/ <![CDATA[ Re: This is Why Women Can't Win Survivor. ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/5260469/t/This-is-Why-Women-Can-t-Win-Survivor-.html#reply-5260469 feeds@yuku.com (pjadedd) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/5260469 Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:33:54 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: This is Why Women Can't Win Survivor. ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/5259772/t/This-is-Why-Women-Can-t-Win-Survivor-.html#reply-5259772 feeds@yuku.com (hpolo) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/5259772 Tue, 27 Oct 2009 05:58:18 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: This is Why Women Can't Win Survivor. ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/5259766/t/This-is-Why-Women-Can-t-Win-Survivor-.html#reply-5259766 feeds@yuku.com (BortBort) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/5259766 Tue, 27 Oct 2009 05:52:41 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: This is Why Women Can't Win Survivor. ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/5259696/t/This-is-Why-Women-Can-t-Win-Survivor-.html#reply-5259696 feeds@yuku.com (survivorpersonguy) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/5259696 Tue, 27 Oct 2009 03:39:10 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: This is Why Women Can't Win Survivor. ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/5252029/t/This-is-Why-Women-Can-t-Win-Survivor-.html#reply-5252029 feeds@yuku.com (Shion is Queen) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/5252029 Sat, 24 Oct 2009 21:13:16 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: This is Why Women Can't Win Survivor. ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/5251378/t/This-is-Why-Women-Can-t-Win-Survivor-.html#reply-5251378
Or maybe do the the sleeping with the enemy twist of Thailand on the 1st 4 weeks, After the immunity challenge both tribes will go to tribal council, Its the winning tribe who will decide who goes home from the losing tribe. For sure they will target the cocky alpha male 1st. ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Kubin) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/5251378 Sat, 24 Oct 2009 17:05:36 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: This is Why Women Can't Win Survivor. ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/5251204/t/This-is-Why-Women-Can-t-Win-Survivor-.html#reply-5251204 Mega64 wrote:
Women apparently aren't allowed to win Survivor anymore. All the women are pretty much stuck with Parvati as a role model, yet they idiotically keep thinking she won because she was a flirt instead of, you know, making solid alliances and shit.

Hell to the no on Parvati as a role model. Flirting as a strategy is completely banal.

Remember Sandra?

Most of the time,... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (River50) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/5251204 Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:41:21 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: This is Why Women Can't Win Survivor. ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/5251092/t/This-is-Why-Women-Can-t-Win-Survivor-.html#reply-5251092 Double Edged Sword wrote:
Mega64 wrote:
Women simply don't have balls anymore.
image



]]> feeds@yuku.com (Cuauhtemoc Gilmore) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/5251092 Sat, 24 Oct 2009 14:52:48 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: This is Why Women Can't Win Survivor. ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/5251041/t/This-is-Why-Women-Can-t-Win-Survivor-.html#reply-5251041 TequilaVaquero wrote:
Strong men in the merge are the complete opposite of dangerous. Who is always the last person from the tribe that gets Pagonged? Colleen, Elisabeth, T-Bird, Jake, Darrah, Shii Ann, Chris, etc.

If you're a woman, what you want are strong men in the merge, they will be targeted 123. I totally agree. After the merge, only one of the strong men can win immunity at a time. The... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (forsbergacct2000) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/5251041 Sat, 24 Oct 2009 14:21:47 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: This is Why Women Can't Win Survivor. ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/5250188/t/This-is-Why-Women-Can-t-Win-Survivor-.html#reply-5250188 Mega64 wrote:
Women simply don't have balls anymore. image

]]> feeds@yuku.com (Double Edged Sword) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/5250188 Sat, 24 Oct 2009 08:57:11 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: This is Why Women Can't Win Survivor. ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/5250079/t/This-is-Why-Women-Can-t-Win-Survivor-.html#reply-5250079 feeds@yuku.com (Apprentice Talker) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/5250079 Sat, 24 Oct 2009 08:26:33 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: This is Why Women Can't Win Survivor. ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/5249948/t/This-is-Why-Women-Can-t-Win-Survivor-.html#reply-5249948
Fucking mactresses don't give a shit about winning, and that's what's so god damn sad about this show now. Only three or four people seem to actually care about winning, if even that. Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Mega64) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/5249948 Sat, 24 Oct 2009 07:38:27 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: This is Why Women Can't Win Survivor. ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/5249937/t/This-is-Why-Women-Can-t-Win-Survivor-.html#reply-5249937 it's like casting purposely cast dumb bitches who can be booted pre-merge
only to increase the chances of more macho guys going up against each other ]]> feeds@yuku.com (sGabe4) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/5249937 Sat, 24 Oct 2009 07:32:45 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: This is Why Women Can't Win Survivor. ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/5249338/t/This-is-Why-Women-Can-t-Win-Survivor-.html#reply-5249338 TequilaVaquero wrote:
Strong men in the merge are the complete opposite of dangerous. Who is always the last person from the tribe that gets Pagonged? Colleen, Elisabeth, T-Bird, Jake, Darrah, Shii Ann, Chris, etc.

If you're a woman, what you want are strong men in the merge, they will be targeted 123. That's a good point. Forget what I posted. My only point is that they will be hard to beat in... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Mister Plum) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/5249338 Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:02:35 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: This is Why Women Can't Win Survivor. ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/5249332/t/This-is-Why-Women-Can-t-Win-Survivor-.html#reply-5249332
If you're a woman, what you want are strong men in the merge, they will be targeted 123. ]]> feeds@yuku.com (TequilaVaquero) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/5249332 Fri, 23 Oct 2009 21:59:41 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: This is Why Women Can't Win Survivor. ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/5249319/t/This-is-Why-Women-Can-t-Win-Survivor-.html#reply-5249319 feeds@yuku.com (Mister Plum) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/5249319 Fri, 23 Oct 2009 21:54:57 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: This is Why Women Can't Win Survivor. ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/5248305/t/This-is-Why-Women-Can-t-Win-Survivor-.html#reply-5248305 Mikester wrote:
And Russell H/Mick/Jaison were clearly not going to vote each other off or split their vote. It made more sense for Natalie and Liz to try to get the other one booted than to "team up."
Considering how much Jaison was been whining the last few days, I'm sure they could have banded together and asked Mick to put Jaison out of his misery.
]]> feeds@yuku.com (Olmec Donald) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/5248305 Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:23:01 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: This is Why Women Can't Win Survivor. ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/5248214/t/This-is-Why-Women-Can-t-Win-Survivor-.html#reply-5248214 GrenadeJumper85 wrote:
Are you retarded? If it's a final three, it doesn't matter how low he is on a three person alliance. He'd still go to the FTC.

Is it a Final 3? With how many people are left and the day they are on, it's a cinch to figure it out now.


Retard.


Also the point of this game is to win. Not to come in second or third. Retard. ]]> feeds@yuku.com (star jumper) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/5248214 Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:54:39 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: This is Why Women Can't Win Survivor. ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/5248060/t/This-is-Why-Women-Can-t-Win-Survivor-.html#reply-5248060 feeds@yuku.com (GrenadeJumper85) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/5248060 Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:00:55 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: This is Why Women Can't Win Survivor. ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/5248056/t/This-is-Why-Women-Can-t-Win-Survivor-.html#reply-5248056 ]]> feeds@yuku.com (kenc333) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/5248056 Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:00:14 GMT <![CDATA[ This is Why Women Can't Win Survivor. ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/59420/t/This-is-Why-Women-Can-t-Win-Survivor-.html "Oh yeah, me too. It's a shame that one of has to go."
"Yeah, what a shame."

What the fuck?! There's *five* of you. One more person and you get the majority. I could somewhat understand this if there were 8 people in the tribe, but that was just pathetic. At least try to get the guys to split the vote between you, and force a tie. It probably wouldn't work, but don't just sit back and... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Yesmar88) http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/59420 Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:42:58 GMT