Wisconsin is considering banning Brazilian waxes... http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/48232/t/Wisconsin-is-considering-banning-Brazilian-waxes-.html en-us Copyright 2006, Yuku feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster) webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster) Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:32:55 GMT Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:50:54 GMT Yuku Feeds 1.0 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Yuku http://static.yuku.com//feed/bypass/images/button-yuku.png http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/48232/t/Wisconsin-is-considering-banning-Brazilian-waxes-.html Yuku - free hosted forums and profiles 88 31 {pics-1.1 "http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html" l gen true for "http://yuku.com" r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) "http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html" l gen true for "http://yuku.com" r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 )) Search Search Domain q http://yuku.com/search/direct/ <![CDATA[ Re: Wisconsin is considering banning Brazilian waxes... ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/4203642/t/Wisconsin-is-considering-banning-Brazilian-waxes-.html#reply-4203642

]]> feeds@yuku.com (itsakat) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/4203642 Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:50:54 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Wisconsin is considering banning Brazilian waxes... ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/4203327/t/Wisconsin-is-considering-banning-Brazilian-waxes-.html#reply-4203327 feeds@yuku.com (merkyl) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/4203327 Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:08:05 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Wisconsin is considering banning Brazilian waxes... ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/4203316/t/Wisconsin-is-considering-banning-Brazilian-waxes-.html#reply-4203316 feeds@yuku.com (Bernard Wrangler) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/4203316 Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:04:10 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Wisconsin is considering banning Brazilian waxes... ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/4202839/t/Wisconsin-is-considering-banning-Brazilian-waxes-.html#reply-4202839 feeds@yuku.com (Hamdingers) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/4202839 Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:39:06 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Wisconsin is considering banning Brazilian waxes... ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/4202768/t/Wisconsin-is-considering-banning-Brazilian-waxes-.html#reply-4202768 feeds@yuku.com (superguppie) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/4202768 Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:21:34 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Wisconsin is considering banning Brazilian waxes... ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/4202367/t/Wisconsin-is-considering-banning-Brazilian-waxes-.html#reply-4202367 feeds@yuku.com (meatball77) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/4202367 Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:34:18 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Wisconsin is considering banning Brazilian waxes... ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/4202262/t/Wisconsin-is-considering-banning-Brazilian-waxes-.html#reply-4202262 merkyl wrote:
I'd like to withdraw my statement, your honor.

i'm uncomfortable with the word 'withdrawing' used in conjunction with you and ill's anus. ]]> feeds@yuku.com (viva la blonde) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/4202262 Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:05:01 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Wisconsin is considering banning Brazilian waxes... ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/4202097/t/Wisconsin-is-considering-banning-Brazilian-waxes-.html#reply-4202097 Vicconius wrote:
Angela in WI wrote:
so will we now have to do backdoor waxings????

image Funny on multiple levels.

i think she meant back alley. but yeah, feeds@yuku.com (factoryhurl) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/4202097 Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:02:49 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Wisconsin is considering banning Brazilian waxes... ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/4202060/t/Wisconsin-is-considering-banning-Brazilian-waxes-.html#reply-4202060 feeds@yuku.com (merkyl) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/4202060 Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:47:57 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Wisconsin is considering banning Brazilian waxes... ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/4202057/t/Wisconsin-is-considering-banning-Brazilian-waxes-.html#reply-4202057 merkyl wrote:
I'm not real comfortable with "merky" and lissie's anus mentioned in the same sentence. image

you prefer 'lissie and merky's anus'? ]]> feeds@yuku.com (viva la blonde) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/4202057 Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:47:03 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Wisconsin is considering banning Brazilian waxes... ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/4202055/t/Wisconsin-is-considering-banning-Brazilian-waxes-.html#reply-4202055 feeds@yuku.com (ilikelissie) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/4202055 Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:46:54 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Wisconsin is considering banning Brazilian waxes... ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/4202052/t/Wisconsin-is-considering-banning-Brazilian-waxes-.html#reply-4202052 Since when?

]]> feeds@yuku.com (Penelope McBagpipe) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/4202052 Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:46:11 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Wisconsin is considering banning Brazilian waxes... ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/4202051/t/Wisconsin-is-considering-banning-Brazilian-waxes-.html#reply-4202051 feeds@yuku.com (Hamdingers) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/4202051 Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:45:06 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Wisconsin is considering banning Brazilian waxes... ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/4202046/t/Wisconsin-is-considering-banning-Brazilian-waxes-.html#reply-4202046 ]]> feeds@yuku.com (merkyl) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/4202046 Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:44:28 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Wisconsin is considering banning Brazilian waxes... ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/4202038/t/Wisconsin-is-considering-banning-Brazilian-waxes-.html#reply-4202038

and I'm pretty sure it was ruined when you posted sugar face, hammy. ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Penelope McBagpipe) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/4202038 Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:41:54 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Wisconsin is considering banning Brazilian waxes... ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/4202021/t/Wisconsin-is-considering-banning-Brazilian-waxes-.html#reply-4202021 feeds@yuku.com (viva la blonde) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/4202021 Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:36:44 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Wisconsin is considering banning Brazilian waxes... ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/4202016/t/Wisconsin-is-considering-banning-Brazilian-waxes-.html#reply-4202016 feeds@yuku.com (Hamdingers) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/4202016 Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:36:12 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Wisconsin is considering banning Brazilian waxes... ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/4202011/t/Wisconsin-is-considering-banning-Brazilian-waxes-.html#reply-4202011

Now you know what it's like to give oral sex to Angela. ]]> feeds@yuku.com (ilikelissie) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/4202011 Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:33:16 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Wisconsin is considering banning Brazilian waxes... ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/4201985/t/Wisconsin-is-considering-banning-Brazilian-waxes-.html#reply-4201985 CBRetriever wrote:
burning and tearing of delicate tissues is what I heard

Except in Angela's case where it's probably as leathered and worn as an old boot. ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Penelope McBagpipe) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/4201985 Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:25:54 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Wisconsin is considering banning Brazilian waxes... ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/4201982/t/Wisconsin-is-considering-banning-Brazilian-waxes-.html#reply-4201982 feeds@yuku.com (merkyl) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/4201982 Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:25:29 GMT <![CDATA[ Wisconsin is considering banning Brazilian waxes... ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/48232/t/Wisconsin-is-considering-banning-Brazilian-waxes-.html feeds@yuku.com (Angela in WI) http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/48232 Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:32:55 GMT