<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>What are some potential Tie Breakers if there is a tied jury vote? </title>
        <link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/44278/t/---potential-Tie-Breakers-----tied-jury-vote-.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ I know they had an envelope for Micronesia and I don&#39;t think they would make them vote again because it wouldn&#39;t seem right for a FTC.
 ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 02:11:43 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:17:01 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What are some potential Tie Breakers if there is a tied jury vote?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3922945/t/---potential-Tie-Breakers-----tied-jury-vote-.html#reply-3922945</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">PrettyGoodYear1988 wrote:</strong>
  <hr>

  <blockquote>
    I think they would just simply make the third place finisher join the jury and cast the final vote. Makes the most sense.
  </blockquote>I don&#39;t think so. They&#39;d have to do it out on location, because it would simply be ridiculously unfair to have someone cast a vote at
  the live reunion (what with a season of edited footage influencing them). If they <span style="FONT-STYLE:... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (burnettfollower)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3922945</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:17:01 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What are some potential Tie Breakers if there is a tied jury vote?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3920753/t/---potential-Tie-Breakers-----tied-jury-vote-.html#reply-3920753</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">SFC wrote:</strong>
  <hr>

  <blockquote>
    <strong class="quote-title">jsundqui wrote:</strong>
    <hr>
    The problem with this scenario is that the single person who voted for the 3rd place finisher (in 3-3-1 situation) would effectively decide the winner even
    though he/she didn&#39;t vote for either of the F2 in the first place.
    <br>
    <br>
    The only logical way to do this is to make the F3 vote as well on the location and in... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (jsundqui)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3920753</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:54:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What are some potential Tie Breakers if there is a tied jury vote?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3918213/t/---potential-Tie-Breakers-----tied-jury-vote-.html#reply-3918213</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I&#39;m still thinking that it could be whoever got the least amount of votes cast against them throughout the whole season.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (quicksilver82)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3918213</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:45:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What are some potential Tie Breakers if there is a tied jury vote?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3918174/t/---potential-Tie-Breakers-----tied-jury-vote-.html#reply-3918174</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ In any case, the tie-breaker, if involving voting, should NOT be carried out after the contestants have returned home since real-life interaction post-show
would definitely alter and cause unfairness to this situation.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (dragoondaniel78)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3918174</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:37:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What are some potential Tie Breakers if there is a tied jury vote?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3917911/t/---potential-Tie-Breakers-----tied-jury-vote-.html#reply-3917911</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>In a final 3 winner tie scenario, a good way would be to have everyone in the final 3, even the non-tied finalist, to unanimously agree on one jury
member&#39;s vote to discount. All 3 of them have to kick someone off the jury, but it has to be a unaminous decision. They vote, and Jeff reads the votes. If
it&#39;s unanimous, then Jeff gets the votes for the winners, takes out the kicked off juror&#39;s vote and throws in into the fire. Then Jeff walks away and
magically appears months... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (TheEasyOne)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3917911</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:46:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What are some potential Tie Breakers if there is a tied jury vote?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3917745/t/---potential-Tie-Breakers-----tied-jury-vote-.html#reply-3917745</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">jsundqui wrote:</strong>
  <hr>

  <blockquote>
    <strong class="quote-title">SFC wrote:</strong>
    <hr>
    I think they would just do what they would do in a normal tie in a F3, eliminate the 3rd place person who would not end up on the Jury , and make the Jury
    vote between the Final 2
  </blockquote>The problem with this scenario is that the single person who voted for the 3rd place finisher (in 3-3-1 situation) would effectively decide... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (SFC)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3917745</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:04:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What are some potential Tie Breakers if there is a tied jury vote?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3917675/t/---potential-Tie-Breakers-----tied-jury-vote-.html#reply-3917675</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Gotta love people complaining that a JUROR (who&#39;s job is to decide the winner in the first place) could potentially get the tie-breaking vote over one of
the Finalists (who were supposed to be FACING the jury. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (XtremeInnovator420)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3917675</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:49:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What are some potential Tie Breakers if there is a tied jury vote?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3916578/t/---potential-Tie-Breakers-----tied-jury-vote-.html#reply-3916578</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">SFC wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  I think they would just do what they would do in a normal tie in a F3, eliminate the 3rd place person who would not end up on the Jury , and make the Jury
  vote between the Final 2
</blockquote>The problem with this scenario is that the single person who voted for the 3rd place finisher (in 3-3-1 situation) would effectively decide the
winner even though he/she didn&#39;t vote for either of the F2 in the first place.... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (jsundqui)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3916578</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:21:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What are some potential Tie Breakers if there is a tied jury vote?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3914512/t/---potential-Tie-Breakers-----tied-jury-vote-.html#reply-3914512</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ It&#39;s interesting...  say there had been a tie in Micronesia and Ami was given the tie vote.  Ami was obviously closer with Amanda than Parv.  Amanda would
have won. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ncassaro)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3914512</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 01:39:01 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What are some potential Tie Breakers if there is a tied jury vote?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3912828/t/---potential-Tie-Breakers-----tied-jury-vote-.html#reply-3912828</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I think they  would just do what they would do in a normal tie in a F3, eliminate the 3rd place person who would not end up on the Jury , and make the Jury
vote between the Final 2 ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (SFC)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3912828</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:33:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What are some potential Tie Breakers if there is a tied jury vote?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3911213/t/---potential-Tie-Breakers-----tied-jury-vote-.html#reply-3911213</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">GrenadeJumper85 wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  I think they would just simply make the third place finisher join the jury and cast the final vote. Makes the most sense.
  <br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
   I think a good way to do it would be after then jury casts their votes, dismiss them, then dismiss the final three, then call the person who placed third
right back in, reveal to them that they did not win but that their was a tie and now  they have to... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (mtj1282)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3911213</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 07:14:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What are some potential Tie Breakers if there is a tied jury vote?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3910713/t/---potential-Tie-Breakers-----tied-jury-vote-.html#reply-3910713</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">quicksilver82 wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  Yeah I don&#39;t get why they had such large juries in CI and Fiji.
  <br>
</blockquote> If they had kept a seven-person jury, there could have been a racial plurality on the jury that would control the vote (if they voted in a bloc)
and potentially give the win to someone of their own race.
<br>
 The large juries on the race-based seasons was (purportedly) designed to fairly represent the races and prevent a... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (unduli clone)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3910713</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:03:59 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What are some potential Tie Breakers if there is a tied jury vote?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3910600/t/---potential-Tie-Breakers-----tied-jury-vote-.html#reply-3910600</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Yeah I don&#39;t get why they had such large juries in CI and Fiji.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (quicksilver82)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3910600</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:31:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What are some potential Tie Breakers if there is a tied jury vote?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3905468/t/---potential-Tie-Breakers-----tied-jury-vote-.html#reply-3905468</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Rebecca deserved her jury spot. <img src="http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/images/emoticons/frown.gif">
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (YemaGrl1988)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3905468</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:46:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What are some potential Tie Breakers if there is a tied jury vote?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3905315/t/---potential-Tie-Breakers-----tied-jury-vote-.html#reply-3905315</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  I think they would just simply make the third place finisher join the jury and cast the final vote. Makes the most sense.
</blockquote>I don&#39;t think so.  They&#39;d have to do it out on location, because it would simply be ridiculously unfair to have someone cast a vote at the
live reunion (what with a season of edited footage influencing them).  If they <span style="font-style: italic;">did</span> do it out there, Jeff would have to
announce the tie out there (probably by... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (PrettyGoodYear1988)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3905315</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:58:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What are some potential Tie Breakers if there is a tied jury vote?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3905204/t/---potential-Tie-Breakers-----tied-jury-vote-.html#reply-3905204</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I think they would just simply make the third place finisher join the jury and cast the final vote. Makes the most sense.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (GrenadeJumper85)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3905204</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:28:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What are some potential Tie Breakers if there is a tied jury vote?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3905184/t/---potential-Tie-Breakers-----tied-jury-vote-.html#reply-3905184</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  Alot of people keep saying this for some reason, but I&#39;d like to hear what their plan was during CI and Fiji with a 3-3-3 tie.
</blockquote>I think the likelihood of three people making F3 and all three of them earning enough respect to get three votes is <span style="font-style: italic;">extremely</span> unlikely, and the show probably realizes that too.  Still, that&#39;s probably why they eliminated 9-person Juries
(aside from the fact that it was stupid for pre-merge... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (PrettyGoodYear1988)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3905184</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:21:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What are some potential Tie Breakers if there is a tied jury vote?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3905141/t/---potential-Tie-Breakers-----tied-jury-vote-.html#reply-3905141</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ They ask in private to each of the F3 players who they would vote for of their two opponents after the jury voting. Then they tell us about this if there IS a
tie. However, if it is F2 and 4-4, they are in deep shit. Dumb 8 jury of micronesia. N/m. Jeff would check the votes in advance there too. And if there is a
tie, he gets the F9 player&#39;s private vote for them to break the tie, then tells us about it in the finale. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (PostnumberZERO)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3905141</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:04:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What are some potential Tie Breakers if there is a tied jury vote?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3904239/t/---potential-Tie-Breakers-----tied-jury-vote-.html#reply-3904239</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  I have no idea what they were planning in Micronesia, but whatever it was, I&#39;m pretty sure it would have occurred out there and not live in NYC...
</blockquote>
<br>
I should hope so!  It would be terrifically unfair to decide the issue after the episodes had aired. If they were going to do that, then they might as well
just go all the way and let the executive story editor choose the winner.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Venatrix Avia)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3904239</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 13:02:20 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What are some potential Tie Breakers if there is a tied jury vote?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3903956/t/---potential-Tie-Breakers-----tied-jury-vote-.html#reply-3903956</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Fire making challenge? We know who would lose that one... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (menelaus)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3903956</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:14:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ What are some potential Tie Breakers if there is a tied jury vote?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/44278/t/---potential-Tie-Breakers-----tied-jury-vote-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I know they had an envelope for Micronesia and I don&#39;t think they would make them vote again because it wouldn&#39;t seem right for a FTC.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (survivorfan16)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/44278</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 02:11:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>