survivor: family edition http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/43617/t/survivor-family-edition.html en-us Copyright 2006, Yuku feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster) webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster) Fri, 19 Dec 2008 21:10:26 GMT Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:26:47 GMT Yuku Feeds 1.0 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Yuku http://static.yuku.com//feed/bypass/images/button-yuku.png http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/43617/t/survivor-family-edition.html Yuku - free hosted forums and profiles 88 31 {pics-1.1 "http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html" l gen true for "http://yuku.com" r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) "http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html" l gen true for "http://yuku.com" r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 )) Search Search Domain q http://yuku.com/search/direct/ <![CDATA[ Re: survivor: family edition ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3849212/t/survivor-family-edition.html#reply-3849212 The Colwells are so the complex tribe, but I'm rooting for the Jacksons. Big Momma Jackson is a challenge fiend! She's totally the new Cirie.

Of course, you know by Episode 5 they're going to merge the four families into two tribes of eight. I think Lindsay is going to regret not taking out her dad, because he and Mrs. Larson are very likely to team up.

]]> feeds@yuku.com (PrettyGoodYear1988) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3849212 Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:26:47 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: survivor: family edition ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3849160/t/survivor-family-edition.html#reply-3849160 Spanky Hot Dog wrote:
image That was hilarious!! image I'm seriously in t.ears right now after reading that. image feeds@yuku.com (WTFscissoring8) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3849160 Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:14:15 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: survivor: family edition ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3849137/t/survivor-family-edition.html#reply-3849137 WTFscissoring8 wrote:
PrettyGoodYear1988 wrote:


It would be interesting to see which families banded together to form alliances, but you'd never have a family turn against their own members unless they were forced to.
image that would... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Spanky Hot Dog) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3849137 Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:02:22 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: survivor: family edition ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3849124/t/survivor-family-edition.html#reply-3849124 PrettyGoodYear1988 wrote:


It would be interesting to see which families banded together to form alliances, but you'd never have a family turn against their own members unless they were forced to. that would be the mother fuckin laffos

son: "mom, it's gonna be really hard to vote someone off... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (WTFscissoring8) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3849124 Fri, 19 Dec 2008 21:57:18 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: survivor: family edition ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3849118/t/survivor-family-edition.html#reply-3849118 Condescending wrote:
They should have a Survivor: Twins edition. Put each twin in a different tribe and see what happens.

GHANDIA was a triplet. Imagine 3 GHANDIAS on the island. That would be GHANDIArific. WHAT THE FUCK?! THIS MUST HAPPEN.

]]> feeds@yuku.com (Mypoody2) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3849118 Fri, 19 Dec 2008 21:55:58 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: survivor: family edition ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3849107/t/survivor-family-edition.html#reply-3849107 ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Apprentice Talker) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3849107 Fri, 19 Dec 2008 21:51:03 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: survivor: family edition ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3849103/t/survivor-family-edition.html#reply-3849103 I'm assuming the most we could have were four families of five (all players being 18 or up, too), competing as tribes at first, and then merging into larger tribes.

It would be interesting to see which families banded together to form alliances, but you'd never have a family turn against their own members unless they were forced to.

]]> feeds@yuku.com (PrettyGoodYear1988) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3849103 Fri, 19 Dec 2008 21:49:21 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: survivor: family edition ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3849099/t/survivor-family-edition.html#reply-3849099 QJaz wrote:
Three words: Amazing Race Eight



yes, im aware of that season.


just polling to see if this shit would fly any better on survivor.

]]> feeds@yuku.com (maersk) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3849099 Fri, 19 Dec 2008 21:47:13 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: survivor: family edition ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3849088/t/survivor-family-edition.html#reply-3849088 feeds@yuku.com (QJaz) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3849088 Fri, 19 Dec 2008 21:44:04 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: survivor: family edition ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3849004/t/survivor-family-edition.html#reply-3849004 feeds@yuku.com (Vyvvi) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3849004 Fri, 19 Dec 2008 21:18:12 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: survivor: family edition ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3848999/t/survivor-family-edition.html#reply-3848999



ETA: Of course, when I say family edition, I mean having one (extended) family for the entire show, not a bunch of small families competing against one another.
]]> feeds@yuku.com (AMBERFREAK) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3848999 Fri, 19 Dec 2008 21:16:54 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: survivor: family edition ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3848991/t/survivor-family-edition.html#reply-3848991
GHANDIA was a triplet. Imagine 3 GHANDIAS on the island. That would be GHANDIArific. ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Condescending) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3848991 Fri, 19 Dec 2008 21:14:08 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: survivor: family edition ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3848989/t/survivor-family-edition.html#reply-3848989
Looking back, I would have flamed myself. ]]> feeds@yuku.com (PrettyGoodYear1988) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3848989 Fri, 19 Dec 2008 21:12:42 GMT <![CDATA[ survivor: family edition ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/43617/t/survivor-family-edition.html feeds@yuku.com (maersk) http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/43617 Fri, 19 Dec 2008 21:10:26 GMT