Nick/Starr: WORST WINNERS SINCE TK/RACHEL? http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/42744/t/Nick-Starr-WORST-WINNERS-SINCE-TK-RACHEL-.html en-us Copyright 2006, Yuku feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster) webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster) Sun, 07 Dec 2008 19:59:34 GMT Sun, 07 Dec 2008 21:19:07 GMT Yuku Feeds 1.0 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Yuku http://static.yuku.com//feed/bypass/images/button-yuku.png http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/42744/t/Nick-Starr-WORST-WINNERS-SINCE-TK-RACHEL-.html Yuku - free hosted forums and profiles 88 31 {pics-1.1 "http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html" l gen true for "http://yuku.com" r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) "http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html" l gen true for "http://yuku.com" r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 )) Search Search Domain q http://yuku.com/search/direct/ <![CDATA[ Re: Nick/Starr: WORST WINNERS SINCE TK/RACHEL? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3794600/t/Nick-Starr-WORST-WINNERS-SINCE-TK-RACHEL-.html#reply-3794600
I am laughing at you guys taking this thread seriously. It was a total dig at everyone who says WORST WINNERS EVAH every single time we have new winners, yw!
]]> feeds@yuku.com (swim4life227) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3794600 Sun, 07 Dec 2008 21:19:06 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Nick/Starr: WORST WINNERS SINCE TK/RACHEL? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3794591/t/Nick-Starr-WORST-WINNERS-SINCE-TK-RACHEL-.html#reply-3794591 @ the title.
]]> feeds@yuku.com (Will) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3794591 Sun, 07 Dec 2008 21:16:14 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Nick/Starr: WORST WINNERS SINCE TK/RACHEL? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3794484/t/Nick-Starr-WORST-WINNERS-SINCE-TK-RACHEL-.html#reply-3794484 craig wrote:
not the boring pair that went for the Fast Forward. wait wait what??!!

which season are you watching?? TAR5? brandon & nicole?

]]> feeds@yuku.com (dragoondaniel78) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3794484 Sun, 07 Dec 2008 20:57:40 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Nick/Starr: WORST WINNERS SINCE TK/RACHEL? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3794448/t/Nick-Starr-WORST-WINNERS-SINCE-TK-RACHEL-.html#reply-3794448 ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Gratebear) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3794448 Sun, 07 Dec 2008 20:52:52 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Nick/Starr: WORST WINNERS SINCE TK/RACHEL? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3794340/t/Nick-Starr-WORST-WINNERS-SINCE-TK-RACHEL-.html#reply-3794340 Plus none of their competitors was any more likeable or entertaining. Not Cheater and Bitch, not Teenwolf and Wolfmom, not the boring pair that went for the Fast Forward. ]]> feeds@yuku.com (craig) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3794340 Sun, 07 Dec 2008 20:35:10 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Nick/Starr: WORST WINNERS SINCE TK/RACHEL? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3794279/t/Nick-Starr-WORST-WINNERS-SINCE-TK-RACHEL-.html#reply-3794279 feeds@yuku.com (boredmale) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3794279 Sun, 07 Dec 2008 20:25:25 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Nick/Starr: WORST WINNERS SINCE TK/RACHEL? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3794266/t/Nick-Starr-WORST-WINNERS-SINCE-TK-RACHEL-.html#reply-3794266 ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Burrito Taco) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3794266 Sun, 07 Dec 2008 20:23:20 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Nick/Starr: WORST WINNERS SINCE TK/RACHEL? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3794259/t/Nick-Starr-WORST-WINNERS-SINCE-TK-RACHEL-.html#reply-3794259 VentDeMilo wrote:
blmetsfan wrote:
They definitely deserved it, but in terms of personality...they have to be close to the bottom.

WHY? BECAUSE THEY DON'T FIGHT EACH OTHER ON TV LIKE A 3 YR OLD???




You can be entertaining without fighting. See Ken and Gerard and Oswald and Danny. ]]> feeds@yuku.com (mundo446) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3794259 Sun, 07 Dec 2008 20:22:48 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Nick/Starr: WORST WINNERS SINCE TK/RACHEL? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3794250/t/Nick-Starr-WORST-WINNERS-SINCE-TK-RACHEL-.html#reply-3794250 blmetsfan wrote:
They definitely deserved it, but in terms of personality...they have to be close to the bottom.

WHY? BECAUSE THEY DON'T FIGHT EACH OTHER ON TV LIKE A 3 YR OLD???


]]> feeds@yuku.com (VentDeMilo) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3794250 Sun, 07 Dec 2008 20:21:25 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Nick/Starr: WORST WINNERS SINCE TK/RACHEL? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3794229/t/Nick-Starr-WORST-WINNERS-SINCE-TK-RACHEL-.html#reply-3794229 ]]> feeds@yuku.com (blmetsfan) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3794229 Sun, 07 Dec 2008 20:18:25 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Nick/Starr: WORST WINNERS SINCE TK/RACHEL? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3794155/t/Nick-Starr-WORST-WINNERS-SINCE-TK-RACHEL-.html#reply-3794155

Even Freddie and Kendra were better
]]> feeds@yuku.com (louie77) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3794155 Sun, 07 Dec 2008 20:08:58 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Nick/Starr: WORST WINNERS SINCE TK/RACHEL? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3794153/t/Nick-Starr-WORST-WINNERS-SINCE-TK-RACHEL-.html#reply-3794153 ]]> feeds@yuku.com (dragoondaniel78) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3794153 Sun, 07 Dec 2008 20:08:52 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Nick/Starr: WORST WINNERS SINCE TK/RACHEL? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3794150/t/Nick-Starr-WORST-WINNERS-SINCE-TK-RACHEL-.html#reply-3794150 Who cares if they deserved it. They were boring as fuck and did not have one entertaining aspect. They were basically a more dominant TK and Rachel.

]]> feeds@yuku.com (mundo446) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3794150 Sun, 07 Dec 2008 20:08:05 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Nick/Starr: WORST WINNERS SINCE TK/RACHEL? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3794133/t/Nick-Starr-WORST-WINNERS-SINCE-TK-RACHEL-.html#reply-3794133 feeds@yuku.com (sammyhain2364) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3794133 Sun, 07 Dec 2008 20:07:08 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Nick/Starr: WORST WINNERS SINCE TK/RACHEL? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3794116/t/Nick-Starr-WORST-WINNERS-SINCE-TK-RACHEL-.html#reply-3794116 feeds@yuku.com (florida) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3794116 Sun, 07 Dec 2008 20:05:09 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Nick/Starr: WORST WINNERS SINCE TK/RACHEL? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3794096/t/Nick-Starr-WORST-WINNERS-SINCE-TK-RACHEL-.html#reply-3794096 ]]> feeds@yuku.com (khnum) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3794096 Sun, 07 Dec 2008 20:03:37 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Nick/Starr: WORST WINNERS SINCE TK/RACHEL? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3794095/t/Nick-Starr-WORST-WINNERS-SINCE-TK-RACHEL-.html#reply-3794095 ]]> feeds@yuku.com (pjadedd) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3794095 Sun, 07 Dec 2008 20:03:34 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Nick/Starr: WORST WINNERS SINCE TK/RACHEL? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3794092/t/Nick-Starr-WORST-WINNERS-SINCE-TK-RACHEL-.html#reply-3794092 feeds@yuku.com (TheyHadFaces) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3794092 Sun, 07 Dec 2008 20:03:27 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Nick/Starr: WORST WINNERS SINCE TK/RACHEL? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3794085/t/Nick-Starr-WORST-WINNERS-SINCE-TK-RACHEL-.html#reply-3794085 ]]> feeds@yuku.com (agent2424) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3794085 Sun, 07 Dec 2008 20:02:44 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Nick/Starr: WORST WINNERS SINCE TK/RACHEL? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3794082/t/Nick-Starr-WORST-WINNERS-SINCE-TK-RACHEL-.html#reply-3794082 ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Maglo87) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3794082 Sun, 07 Dec 2008 20:02:25 GMT <![CDATA[ Nick/Starr: WORST WINNERS SINCE TK/RACHEL? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/42744/t/Nick-Starr-WORST-WINNERS-SINCE-TK-RACHEL-.html
Thoughts plz!
]]> feeds@yuku.com (swim4life227) http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/42744 Sun, 07 Dec 2008 19:59:34 GMT