Why was Sugar "safe" this week? http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/39670/t/Why-was-Sugar-safe-this-week-.html en-us Copyright 2006, Yuku feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster) webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster) Fri, 10 Oct 2008 01:01:48 GMT Sat, 11 Oct 2008 02:24:23 GMT Yuku Feeds 1.0 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Yuku http://static.yuku.com//feed/bypass/images/button-yuku.png http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/39670/t/Why-was-Sugar-safe-this-week-.html Yuku - free hosted forums and profiles 88 31 {pics-1.1 "http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html" l gen true for "http://yuku.com" r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) "http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html" l gen true for "http://yuku.com" r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 )) Search Search Domain q http://yuku.com/search/direct/ <![CDATA[ Re: Why was Sugar "safe" this week? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3575379/t/Why-was-Sugar-safe-this-week-.html#reply-3575379

]]> feeds@yuku.com (MidnightPrince69) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3575379 Sat, 11 Oct 2008 02:24:23 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Why was Sugar "safe" this week? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3575378/t/Why-was-Sugar-safe-this-week-.html#reply-3575378 tomersde wrote:

^^
Bruce was the reason Casaya dominatade pre-merge. Before Bruce joined Casaya it looked like they were going to get Ulonged. Watch episode 2 of EI and you'll see how much they sucked.



the reason Casaya starts to rocks was because they decided to choose challenge leader which was Aras so they're more strategic and organized NOT because of Bruce. Bruce helps with... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (hagiz1) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3575378 Sat, 11 Oct 2008 02:21:48 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Why was Sugar "safe" this week? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3571937/t/Why-was-Sugar-safe-this-week-.html#reply-3571937 ^^
Bruce was the reason Casaya dominatade pre-merge. Before Bruce joined Casaya it looked like they were going to get Ulonged. Watch episode 2 of EI and you'll see how much they sucked.

]]> feeds@yuku.com (tomersde) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3571937 Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:55:42 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Why was Sugar "safe" this week? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3571683/t/Why-was-Sugar-safe-this-week-.html#reply-3571683 JaMalle wrote:
Similar thing happened to Sylvia from Fiji where she went off to EI then returned to the loser tribe. It's a sucky fate imo. I mean really, who wants to join the loser tribe?! lol Totally... If the person was left out of the pick'em, he/she can't be that great in challenges and then the person joins the losing tribe. That won't make the tribe any stronger.

]]> feeds@yuku.com (strawberrybitch) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3571683 Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:21:14 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Why was Sugar "safe" this week? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3571597/t/Why-was-Sugar-safe-this-week-.html#reply-3571597 aboutbreakingrules wrote:
NotQuiteDeadYet wrote:

All the talk at camp made it sound like they would've voted for Sugar had she been there. Is this more tampering by MB for his fave?


Yes. Producers have their favorites, and here they do play favorites. Obviously, Sugar was at or near the top of the Gabon list.... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (WiscBadger95) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3571597 Fri, 10 Oct 2008 08:51:39 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Why was Sugar "safe" this week? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3571587/t/Why-was-Sugar-safe-this-week-.html#reply-3571587 NotQuiteDeadYet wrote:

All the talk at camp made it sound like they would've voted for Sugar had she been there. Is this more tampering by MB for his fave?


Yes. Producers have their favorites, and here they do play favorites. Obviously, Sugar was at or near the top of the Gabon list. ]]> feeds@yuku.com (aboutbreakingrules) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3571587 Fri, 10 Oct 2008 08:48:43 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Why was Sugar "safe" this week? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3571100/t/Why-was-Sugar-safe-this-week-.html#reply-3571100 feeds@yuku.com (MidnightPrince69) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3571100 Fri, 10 Oct 2008 05:13:05 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Why was Sugar "safe" this week? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3571063/t/Why-was-Sugar-safe-this-week-.html#reply-3571063 ]]> feeds@yuku.com (nordicsurvivor) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3571063 Fri, 10 Oct 2008 03:44:43 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Why was Sugar "safe" this week? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3571062/t/Why-was-Sugar-safe-this-week-.html#reply-3571062 ]]> feeds@yuku.com (tuobadag) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3571062 Fri, 10 Oct 2008 03:38:05 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Why was Sugar "safe" this week? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3571048/t/Why-was-Sugar-safe-this-week-.html#reply-3571048 Sole Survivor Genius wrote:
ncassaro wrote:
Same thing happened with Bruce on Exile Island.
See post 5

and post 7 too
]]> feeds@yuku.com (hagiz1) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3571048 Fri, 10 Oct 2008 03:17:22 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Why was Sugar "safe" this week? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3571000/t/Why-was-Sugar-safe-this-week-.html#reply-3571000 ncassaro wrote:
Same thing happened with Bruce on Exile Island. See post 5
]]> feeds@yuku.com (Sole Survivor Genius) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3571000 Fri, 10 Oct 2008 01:43:37 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Why was Sugar "safe" this week? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3570996/t/Why-was-Sugar-safe-this-week-.html#reply-3570996 feeds@yuku.com (ncassaro) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3570996 Fri, 10 Oct 2008 01:41:48 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Why was Sugar "safe" this week? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3570962/t/Why-was-Sugar-safe-this-week-.html#reply-3570962 feeds@yuku.com (platinumtlc) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3570962 Fri, 10 Oct 2008 01:12:42 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Why was Sugar "safe" this week? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3570959/t/Why-was-Sugar-safe-this-week-.html#reply-3570959 feeds@yuku.com (star jumper) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3570959 Fri, 10 Oct 2008 01:10:55 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Why was Sugar "safe" this week? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3570955/t/Why-was-Sugar-safe-this-week-.html#reply-3570955
image


]]> feeds@yuku.com (Sole Survivor Genius) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3570955 Fri, 10 Oct 2008 01:07:24 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Why was Sugar "safe" this week? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3570954/t/Why-was-Sugar-safe-this-week-.html#reply-3570954
- Bruce from Panama
- Sally from Panama
- Candice from cook Islands
- Sylvia from Fiji
- Earl from Fiji
- Lisi from Fiji

rewatch them.

k
thx bye ]]> feeds@yuku.com (hagiz1) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3570954 Fri, 10 Oct 2008 01:06:47 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Why was Sugar "safe" this week? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3570952/t/Why-was-Sugar-safe-this-week-.html#reply-3570952 ]]> feeds@yuku.com (khnum) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3570952 Fri, 10 Oct 2008 01:05:59 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Why was Sugar "safe" this week? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3570951/t/Why-was-Sugar-safe-this-week-.html#reply-3570951 feeds@yuku.com (JaMalle) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3570951 Fri, 10 Oct 2008 01:05:36 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Why was Sugar "safe" this week? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3570949/t/Why-was-Sugar-safe-this-week-.html#reply-3570949 image


]]> feeds@yuku.com (Sole Survivor Genius) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3570949 Fri, 10 Oct 2008 01:05:22 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Why was Sugar "safe" this week? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3570948/t/Why-was-Sugar-safe-this-week-.html#reply-3570948 ]]> feeds@yuku.com (khnum) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3570948 Fri, 10 Oct 2008 01:04:45 GMT <![CDATA[ Why was Sugar "safe" this week? ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/39670/t/Why-was-Sugar-safe-this-week-.html Every other time someone went to EI they came back for TC. So why change the rules for Sugar? Why was she given a free ticket out of jail this week?


All the talk at camp made it sound like they would've voted for Sugar had she been there. Is this more tampering by MB for his fave?

]]> feeds@yuku.com (NotQuiteDeadYet) http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/39670 Fri, 10 Oct 2008 01:01:48 GMT