<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Why Would Mark Being The Mole Be A Good Thing Again? </title>
        <link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/36458/t/Why-Would-Mark-Being-The-Mole-Be-A-Good-Thing-Again-.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ I just don&#39;t get how Mark being the Mole would be good. I&#39;d love for Nicole to be the Mole, but I&#39;d still much prefer Craig being the Mole to Mark.


I mean, what would be the point of the show if Mark is the Mole? Everyone has &quot;sabotaged&quot; something or another, but Mark has, by far, sabotaged the
least of pretty much everyone, but especially the remaining 3. If he&#39;s the Mole maybe next season the Mole just won&#39;t sabotage anything at all to stay
hidden.


So, why... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:31:19 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:12:19 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why Would Mark Being The Mole Be A Good Thing Again?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3284491/t/Why-Would-Mark-Being-The-Mole-Be-A-Good-Thing-Again-.html#reply-3284491</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ IIRC, he wasn&#39;t hardcore pushing the &quot;cutting both wires idea&quot;, he just wanted to take time to consider if red+blue meant purple or both. Which
could mean he was the mole, or it could mean he didn&#39;t want them to cut the wrong one.
<br>
<br>
<br>
I was referring more to the &quot;several instances where he tried to sabotage but failed&quot;. And personally, I&#39;m not sure it would have been so obvious
if Mark didn&#39;t run the whole time. It&#39;s not like they all saw him... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (cindidindi76)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3284491</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:12:18 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why Would Mark Being The Mole Be A Good Thing Again?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3284115/t/Why-Would-Mark-Being-The-Mole-Be-A-Good-Thing-Again-.html#reply-3284115</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Well, just like an above poster pointed out, he may have been trying to get them to cut both the blue and red wire (but I don&#39;t recall right now if he was
really trying to push this option).
<br>
<br>
I also think that the treadmill challenge was a situation in which it would be difficult to sabotage without being obvious.  No one would believe that he
needed to stop running, because he&#39;s such a strong runner.  I&#39;m still convinced that Craig and Nicole were deliberately answering... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Goosehead)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3284115</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:03:47 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why Would Mark Being The Mole Be A Good Thing Again?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3283780/t/Why-Would-Mark-Being-The-Mole-Be-A-Good-Thing-Again-.html#reply-3283780</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Kitty Pryde1 wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  That&#39;s something I&#39;ve noticed. There are several instances in which Mark has TRIED to sabotage but failed, or he&#39;s just been put in a position
  where if he were to sabotage, it would be extremely obvious.
</blockquote>

<p> </p>
<br>
Such as...? ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (cindidindi76)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3283780</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 12:57:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why Would Mark Being The Mole Be A Good Thing Again?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3273216/t/Why-Would-Mark-Being-The-Mole-Be-A-Good-Thing-Again-.html#reply-3273216</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Going for the Dossier is a great Player move.  Without it, you have a 50/50 chance of winning $495,000.  With it, you have a better than 50/50 chance of
winning $420,000.  How much better?  Well, to use game theory and calculate the value of each choice:
<br>
<br>
50% * $495,000 = $247,500
<br>
58.9% * $420,000 = $247,500
<br>
<br>
Essentially, you had to just hope the Dossier would give you a 59% chance of winning (or better), instead of a 50% chance of winning, for it to be the right
choice. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Screerider)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3273216</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 10:19:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why Would Mark Being The Mole Be A Good Thing Again?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3272791/t/Why-Would-Mark-Being-The-Mole-Be-A-Good-Thing-Again-.html#reply-3272791</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Typically, the mole helps the players win the final task (Kathryn in Three Rooms, Bill rejecting the dossier in Top Secret, Frederique in It Takes a Thief, and
Angie with that picture game). I think Mark initially planned on helping them win the final mission, BUT I think Mark needed to keep the $75,000 out of the pot
because he tried to sabotage the clock-bomb game, but Craig ended up cutting the purple wire instead of blue+red, so Mark had to go for the dossier. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (spanellers1)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3272791</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 07:45:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why Would Mark Being The Mole Be A Good Thing Again?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3272110/t/Why-Would-Mark-Being-The-Mole-Be-A-Good-Thing-Again-.html#reply-3272110</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ if mark was the mole, that would really suck that he took the dossier...the mole needs to just give the players a break on the last mission and let them have
some money...its tradition and its the right thing to do...that&#39;s why Craig was walking so slow, I liked him again after this episode ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (veeisforvictory)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3272110</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:08:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why Would Mark Being The Mole Be A Good Thing Again?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3271130/t/Why-Would-Mark-Being-The-Mole-Be-A-Good-Thing-Again-.html#reply-3271130</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ That&#39;s something I&#39;ve noticed.  There are several instances in which Mark has TRIED to sabotage but failed, or he&#39;s just been put in a position
where if he were to sabotage, it would be extremely obvious. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Kitty Pryde1)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3271130</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 21:04:29 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why Would Mark Being The Mole Be A Good Thing Again?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3271091/t/Why-Would-Mark-Being-The-Mole-Be-A-Good-Thing-Again-.html#reply-3271091</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Why do I want him to be the mole? That&#39;s easy -- because I like being right.
<br>
<br>
Besides, he just cost Craig or Nicole $75,000 tonight. There, happy? ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Riff)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3271091</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 20:57:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why Would Mark Being The Mole Be A Good Thing Again?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3270025/t/Why-Would-Mark-Being-The-Mole-Be-A-Good-Thing-Again-.html#reply-3270025</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ For the Mole.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Will)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3270025</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 17:33:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why Would Mark Being The Mole Be A Good Thing Again?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3269885/t/Why-Would-Mark-Being-The-Mole-Be-A-Good-Thing-Again-.html#reply-3269885</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ What is FOMO? ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Beautiful Patsy)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3269885</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 17:08:59 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why Would Mark Being The Mole Be A Good Thing Again?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3269159/t/Why-Would-Mark-Being-The-Mole-Be-A-Good-Thing-Again-.html#reply-3269159</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ If Mark is the Mole, more than likely we&#39;ll learn that he: 1. did some sabotage that viewers wouldn&#39;t be able to detect; 2. tried but ultimately failed
to sabotage in many moments; 3. found himself in bad positions for sabotaging.
<br>
<br>
I still think it&#39;s quite possible that mid to end game too many players were on to him and watching him like a hawk, and as a result he found himself
unable to sabotage without it being obvious.
<br>
<br>
But all you MarkFOMO-haters are right,... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Goosehead)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3269159</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:36:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why Would Mark Being The Mole Be A Good Thing Again?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3268087/t/Why-Would-Mark-Being-The-Mole-Be-A-Good-Thing-Again-.html#reply-3268087</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Yes.  Please give me an example where editing may have made it look like Mark contributed money to the pot but actually didn&#39;t. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Screerider)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3268087</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 10:39:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why Would Mark Being The Mole Be A Good Thing Again?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3264844/t/Why-Would-Mark-Being-The-Mole-Be-A-Good-Thing-Again-.html#reply-3264844</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>Ok ok, top 5 american reality tv asians.
<br>
<br>
&lt;3 Thao and Zabrina&amp; Jo Jer</p> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (TAR Addict)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3264844</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 17:31:49 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why Would Mark Being The Mole Be A Good Thing Again?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3264605/t/Why-Would-Mark-Being-The-Mole-Be-A-Good-Thing-Again-.html#reply-3264605</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Does that include Asian versions of reality shows? ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (cindidindi76)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3264605</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 16:34:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why Would Mark Being The Mole Be A Good Thing Again?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3262394/t/Why-Would-Mark-Being-The-Mole-Be-A-Good-Thing-Again-.html#reply-3262394</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">littltimmy wrote:</strong>
  <hr>

  <div>
    <blockquote>
      <div>
        Heather was on to him. Dorothy had no clue until Heather told her. Thats why Dorothy won. But still Dorothy &lt;3
        <br>
      </div>
    </blockquote>I thought Heather was only onto Bill, like, one quiz before she told Dorothy, and before that, she thought it was Dorothy, and before that,
    Elavia. But regardless, Dorothy &lt;3
    <br>
    <br>
  </div>... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (TAR Addict)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3262394</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 23:52:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why Would Mark Being The Mole Be A Good Thing Again?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3261796/t/Why-Would-Mark-Being-The-Mole-Be-A-Good-Thing-Again-.html#reply-3261796</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <div>
  <blockquote>
    <div>
      Heather was on to him. Dorothy had no clue until Heather told her. Thats why Dorothy won. But still Dorothy &lt;3
      <br>
    </div>
  </blockquote>I thought Heather was only onto Bill, like, one quiz before she told Dorothy, and before that, she thought it was Dorothy, and before that,
  Elavia. But regardless, Dorothy &lt;3
  <br>
  <br>
  Mark being the mole would be better than Craig being the mole, because if Craig isn&#39;t the mole, it means he... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (littltimmy)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3261796</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 21:49:16 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why Would Mark Being The Mole Be A Good Thing Again?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3260963/t/Why-Would-Mark-Being-The-Mole-Be-A-Good-Thing-Again-.html#reply-3260963</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Um, editing can&#39;t change the fact that he added $50,000 to the pot with the Exemption in the cage challenge and $70,000 to the pot with the
wine-riddles-treadmill challenge--which he could have sabotaged very very easily and in a subtle way if he had taken a role besides running on the treadmill.
<br>
<br>
Just those 2 decisions added $120,000 to the pot. That&#39;s about 1/3 of the pot right there.
<br>
<br>
Not to mention the fact that he yelled at Craig to put in the correct code in... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (catspasms)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3260963</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 19:09:35 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why Would Mark Being The Mole Be A Good Thing Again?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3260725/t/Why-Would-Mark-Being-The-Mole-Be-A-Good-Thing-Again-.html#reply-3260725</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I agree with the above poster. As a Mark-FOMO supporter, I&#39;m really hoping that they&#39;ll show us things that none of us could possibly have caught onto,
and if he&#39;s the Mole, I have a feeling that he got into some difficult situations in which sabotage would be difficult without giving himself away (and
example being the treadmill position in that wine mission. I think that Craig and Nicole were testing him to see if he would pipe up with the obvious answers
or not). ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Goosehead)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3260725</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 18:21:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why Would Mark Being The Mole Be A Good Thing Again?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3260180/t/Why-Would-Mark-Being-The-Mole-Be-A-Good-Thing-Again-.html#reply-3260180</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Only thing I&#39;d remind you of (Scree especially) is that sometimes they edit things to not quite show sabotages as they happened.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Latuki Joe)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3260180</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 15:47:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why Would Mark Being The Mole Be A Good Thing Again?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3258531/t/Why-Would-Mark-Being-The-Mole-Be-A-Good-Thing-Again-.html#reply-3258531</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Heather was on to him. Dorothy had no clue until Heather told her. Thats why Dorothy won. But still Dorothy &lt;3 ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (TAR Addict)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3258531</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 02:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Why Would Mark Being The Mole Be A Good Thing Again?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/36458/t/Why-Would-Mark-Being-The-Mole-Be-A-Good-Thing-Again-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I just don&#39;t get how Mark being the Mole would be good. I&#39;d love for Nicole to be the Mole, but I&#39;d still much prefer Craig being the Mole to Mark.
<br>
<br>
I mean, what would be the point of the show if Mark is the Mole? Everyone has &quot;sabotaged&quot; something or another, but Mark has, by far, sabotaged the
least of pretty much everyone, but especially the remaining 3. If he&#39;s the Mole maybe next season the Mole just won&#39;t sabotage anything at all to stay
hidden.... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Beautiful Patsy)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/36458</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:31:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>