<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>New low for Reality Television </title>
        <link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/34234/t/New-low-for-Reality-Television.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ But I liked it.

Three hot babes in black underwear walking the streets of a grimy South American city- LIKE HOOKERS IN A PORNO!

What depraved production assistant dreamed this up?

No wonder Ali left.

What&#39;s next?
 ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 06:39:34 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:44:20 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: New low for Reality Television  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3095000/t/New-low-for-Reality-Television.html#reply-3095000</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ But Sarah was fully clothed and in the shadows when she serviced the &quot;millionaire&quot;.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (victalac)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3095000</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:44:20 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: New low for Reality Television  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3094922/t/New-low-for-Reality-Television.html#reply-3094922</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Lets not forget the lowest of lows &quot;who wants to marry a millionaire&quot; ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (rcbought)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3094922</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:24:26 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: New low for Reality Television  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3088907/t/New-low-for-Reality-Television.html#reply-3088907</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Tila Tequila. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Seyz)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3088907</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 20:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: New low for Reality Television  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3083928/t/New-low-for-Reality-Television.html#reply-3083928</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">cyclehausen wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  If you think this is a reality TV low, you&#39;ve never seen The Surreal Life, A Shot At Love, or Paradise Island 2.  
</blockquote> Or Temptation Island...that show in general was a pretty low moment! ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (visa18)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3083928</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:00:06 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: New low for Reality Television  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3083073/t/New-low-for-Reality-Television.html#reply-3083073</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ If you think this is a reality TV low, you&#39;ve never seen The Surreal Life, A Shot At Love, or Paradise Island 2.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (cyclehausen)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3083073</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 06:42:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: New low for Reality Television  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3083046/t/New-low-for-Reality-Television.html#reply-3083046</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ BB doesn&#39;t count. It&#39;s not reality when you are locked in a cage.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (victalac)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3083046</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 06:26:16 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: New low for Reality Television  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3080518/t/New-low-for-Reality-Television.html#reply-3080518</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Yep this was certainly a lower standard than BB having them nude for that one challenge <img src="http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a341/MisterSlippery/icons-anims/lbf.gif" alt="image">
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (agent2424)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3080518</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:35:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: New low for Reality Television  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3080323/t/New-low-for-Reality-Television.html#reply-3080323</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ That was pretty silly of them to think they were actually going to get a nice relaxing day off. Morons. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (cindidindi76)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3080323</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:57:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: New low for Reality Television  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3080174/t/New-low-for-Reality-Television.html#reply-3080174</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I think plenty of other reality shows have sunk to lower lows than that. They had boy shorts and sports bras- that&#39;s practically conservative nowadays.
<br>
<br>
But if I were a mole contestant... and they told me I&#39;d have a spa day off... I&#39;d be super suspicious, I&#39;d keep everything close to me at all
times. that&#39;s just me. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (angelinab)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3080174</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:13:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: New low for Reality Television  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3078097/t/New-low-for-Reality-Television.html#reply-3078097</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ It was nothing that risque or interesting,but I did enjoy it throughly ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Dr Will Hatch two point oh)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3078097</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 21:27:29 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: New low for Reality Television  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3077303/t/New-low-for-Reality-Television.html#reply-3077303</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <br>
<img src="http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/images/emoticons/alien.gif" alt="image">

<p><br></p> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Fei Long Dragon)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3077303</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:00:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: New low for Reality Television  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3077216/t/New-low-for-Reality-Television.html#reply-3077216</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">unkle greggo wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  Don&#39;t forget that on the original players had to pose naked for an artist. The underwear thing wasn&#39;t that bad, I see girls at the grocery store
  wearing less.
</blockquote>

<p> </p>Me too... and sadly they&#39;re 12. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (CC1018)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3077216</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:31:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: New low for Reality Television  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3074412/t/New-low-for-Reality-Television.html#reply-3074412</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <img src="http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a341/MisterSlippery/icons-anims/lbf.gif">  Fox would be a good fit, don&#39;t you think? 
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (NiceToAnimals)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3074412</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 20:58:18 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: New low for Reality Television  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3074362/t/New-low-for-Reality-Television.html#reply-3074362</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">NiceToAnimals wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  The remaining women slowly liking popsicles to find a clue inside each one.
  <br>
  <br>
  The women Jello wrestling, the winner gets an exemption.
  <br>
</blockquote>

<p> </p>  I nominate you to be the head of reality tv programming for the broadcast network of your choosing.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (GnarlsInCharge)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3074362</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 20:43:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: New low for Reality Television  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3073570/t/New-low-for-Reality-Television.html#reply-3073570</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ But here, we learned that the girls were wearing nothing on under their robes, and every right-thinking American male had to be hoping that the producers would
stick to the original rules- instead of chickening out with that black crap.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (victalac)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3073570</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:54:22 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: New low for Reality Television  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3072392/t/New-low-for-Reality-Television.html#reply-3072392</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Cross-dressing in Switzerland. That is all. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (NiamheDog)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3072392</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:15:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: New low for Reality Television  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3071874/t/New-low-for-Reality-Television.html#reply-3071874</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Don&#39;t forget that on the original players had to pose naked for an artist. The underwear thing wasn&#39;t that bad, I see girls at the grocery store
wearing less. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (unkle greggo)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3071874</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:01:35 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: New low for Reality Television  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3071845/t/New-low-for-Reality-Television.html#reply-3071845</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The remaining women slowly liking popsicles to find a clue inside each one.
<br>
<br>
The women Jello wrestling, the winner gets an exemption.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (NiceToAnimals)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3071845</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 07:46:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ New low for Reality Television  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/34234/t/New-low-for-Reality-Television.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ But I liked it.
<br>
Three hot babes in black underwear walking the streets of a grimy South American city- LIKE HOOKERS IN A PORNO!
<br>
What depraved production assistant dreamed this up?
<br>
No wonder Ali left.
<br>
What&#39;s next?
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (victalac)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/34234</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 06:39:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>