<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Parvati - NEW AMBER BUT MORE ENTERTAINING AND LESS DESERVING!!!! </title>
        <link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/31963/t/Parvati-NEW-AMBER-BUT-MORE-ENTERTAINING-AND-LESS-DESERVING-.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ And Jeff once accurately predict that you will be.
 ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 21:05:58 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 16:07:02 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Parvati - NEW AMBER BUT MORE ENTERTAINING AND LESS DESERVING!!!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2930454/t/Parvati-NEW-AMBER-BUT-MORE-ENTERTAINING-AND-LESS-DESERVING-.html#reply-2930454</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Amanda is a lot more reserved and is only outgoing with the people she befriends or aligns herself with.. another reason why Parvati was more deserving.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (SPunKeeMonKee)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2930454</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 16:07:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Parvati - NEW AMBER BUT MORE ENTERTAINING AND LESS DESERVING!!!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2930439/t/Parvati-NEW-AMBER-BUT-MORE-ENTERTAINING-AND-LESS-DESERVING-.html#reply-2930439</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ From my understanding, Amand is hard to get to know. Parvati is a bitch but personable. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (finishthemoff)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2930439</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 16:02:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Parvati - NEW AMBER BUT MORE ENTERTAINING AND LESS DESERVING!!!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2930379/t/Parvati-NEW-AMBER-BUT-MORE-ENTERTAINING-AND-LESS-DESERVING-.html#reply-2930379</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Parvati is the very definition of somebody who won by default. Going into final tribal, it was Amanda&#39;s game to lose. She blew it there, and so Parvati won
- not because she did anything WELL but because Amanda is such a godawful speaker that she convinces people to vote against her!
<br>
<br>
I was floored by Amanda&#39;s answer to Cirie&#39;s question, even knowing how much she sucks as a speaker. Cirie asked why Parvati was more deserving than her
to win a million dollars. Wasn&#39;t... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Drew B)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2930379</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 15:44:20 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Parvati - NEW AMBER BUT MORE ENTERTAINING AND LESS DESERVING!!!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2930302/t/Parvati-NEW-AMBER-BUT-MORE-ENTERTAINING-AND-LESS-DESERVING-.html#reply-2930302</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Next Amazing Race.... Amanda and Ozzy. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (jokermantoo)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2930302</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 15:26:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Parvati - NEW AMBER BUT MORE ENTERTAINING AND LESS DESERVING!!!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2930263/t/Parvati-NEW-AMBER-BUT-MORE-ENTERTAINING-AND-LESS-DESERVING-.html#reply-2930263</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Amber basically made it to ASS because there are less to choose from (up to Season seven) while Parvati shockingly made it when half of the contestants are
newbie and other half are so-called &quot;favorite&quot;. That is beyond tenth season. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (finishthemoff)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2930263</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 15:20:27 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Parvati - NEW AMBER BUT MORE ENTERTAINING AND LESS DESERVING!!!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2930233/t/Parvati-NEW-AMBER-BUT-MORE-ENTERTAINING-AND-LESS-DESERVING-.html#reply-2930233</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I thought that Parvati was a great winner. Honestly though, during Australia, I never remembered Amber. When thinking of the survivors on that season, Amber is
the one I always forget. When they would show screen shots of large groups of people, it always took me a few seconds to recognize Amber; she was so
forgettable.
<br>
<br>
Amber was useless, Parvati was not. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (yellowfang)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2930233</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 15:13:54 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Parvati - NEW AMBER BUT MORE ENTERTAINING AND LESS DESERVING!!!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2930183/t/Parvati-NEW-AMBER-BUT-MORE-ENTERTAINING-AND-LESS-DESERVING-.html#reply-2930183</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ amanda reminds more of amber than parv: same doe eye thing, same im all innocent attitude, same having other people do the dirty work, and amber had rob where
as amanda had ozzy. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (yosimtesam)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2930183</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 15:04:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Parvati - NEW AMBER BUT MORE ENTERTAINING AND LESS DESERVING!!!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2930165/t/Parvati-NEW-AMBER-BUT-MORE-ENTERTAINING-AND-LESS-DESERVING-.html#reply-2930165</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Thailandsurvivor wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  I still have no idea how Ozzy was considered a favorite from CI. He didn&#39;t do shit, was almost invisible towards the end, and had the worst social game
  ever.
</blockquote>

<p> His social game may have been weak, but he was brilliant in the challenges.</p> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Krusty001)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2930165</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 14:59:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Parvati - NEW AMBER BUT MORE ENTERTAINING AND LESS DESERVING!!!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2930159/t/Parvati-NEW-AMBER-BUT-MORE-ENTERTAINING-AND-LESS-DESERVING-.html#reply-2930159</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">WylDawg wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  Amber played the exact same way both times, never brought anything new to the table and won because the second time she picked the right person to hide
  behind. 
  <br>
   
</blockquote>She would have killed Jerri.
<br>
<br>
And I don&#39;t get why everyone is complaining about Amanda making it as a Favorite. I hated her this season, but she was edited like a freaking genius last
time around. Parv on the other... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Thailandsurvivor)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2930159</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 14:56:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Parvati - NEW AMBER BUT MORE ENTERTAINING AND LESS DESERVING!!!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2930118/t/Parvati-NEW-AMBER-BUT-MORE-ENTERTAINING-AND-LESS-DESERVING-.html#reply-2930118</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Parvati was more entertaining and much more deserving than Ambore! ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Krusty001)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2930118</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 14:47:47 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Parvati - NEW AMBER BUT MORE ENTERTAINING AND LESS DESERVING!!!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2930070/t/Parvati-NEW-AMBER-BUT-MORE-ENTERTAINING-AND-LESS-DESERVING-.html#reply-2930070</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Both Amber and Parvati were the obvious &quot;WTF?&quot; choice for All-Stars but the huge difference is that Parv proved she could kick it up a notch on her
second try and show people that she deserved to be there.
<br>
<br>
Amber played the exact same way both times, never brought anything new to the table and won because the second time she picked the right person to hide behind.
<br>
<br>
Not to mention both started off with a showmance but Parv showed us it was only temporary and she... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (WylDawg)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2930070</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 14:38:49 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Parvati - NEW AMBER BUT MORE ENTERTAINING AND LESS DESERVING!!!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2930038/t/Parvati-NEW-AMBER-BUT-MORE-ENTERTAINING-AND-LESS-DESERVING-.html#reply-2930038</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Parvati played a great game, I&#39;m sooo glad she won!!!!!!!!!! :-)
<br>
<br>
PARVATI &lt;333333 ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (BigBrothrFan)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2930038</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 14:35:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Parvati - NEW AMBER BUT MORE ENTERTAINING AND LESS DESERVING!!!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2929995/t/Parvati-NEW-AMBER-BUT-MORE-ENTERTAINING-AND-LESS-DESERVING-.html#reply-2929995</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">finishthemoff wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  And yet no one mention that Jason *should* have use his HII when he have a chance to oust Parvati permanently from the game.
</blockquote>

<p>Good point. So many moments throughout the game could have gone another way. If Parvati hadn&#39;t been on the ball in Episode 1, she could have been the
first boot.
<br></p>

<p>Let&#39;s recall the Favorites were not immediately cohesive and working well in challenges.... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (AllMenAreIslands)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2929995</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 14:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Parvati - NEW AMBER BUT MORE ENTERTAINING AND LESS DESERVING!!!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2929944/t/Parvati-NEW-AMBER-BUT-MORE-ENTERTAINING-AND-LESS-DESERVING-.html#reply-2929944</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ And yet no one mention that Jason *should* have use his HII when he have a chance to oust Parvati permanently from the game. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (finishthemoff)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2929944</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 14:17:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Parvati - NEW AMBER BUT MORE ENTERTAINING AND LESS DESERVING!!!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2929899/t/Parvati-NEW-AMBER-BUT-MORE-ENTERTAINING-AND-LESS-DESERVING-.html#reply-2929899</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I wasn&#39;t saying it was rigged for Parvati to win, but it was damn sure rigged for a woman to win. Parv made the big move to boot Ozzy and then had a F5
plan where she was F3 with each of the two pairs and likely had F2 with both Amanda and Natalie. She was said to be a lot closer to Natalie than the
camera&#39;s ever showed - she worked everybody, but I don&#39;t think Amanda, and Natalie know it still. Alexis seemed to finally catch on at the town hall
last night. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (shoeless rye)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2929899</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 14:05:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Parvati - NEW AMBER BUT MORE ENTERTAINING AND LESS DESERVING!!!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2929893/t/Parvati-NEW-AMBER-BUT-MORE-ENTERTAINING-AND-LESS-DESERVING-.html#reply-2929893</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Us Kids Know wrote:</strong>
  <hr>

  <p>*hem hem*
  <br>
  <br>
  <font size="7">THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS COATTAIL RIDERS GAWD</font></p>
</blockquote>

<p> </p>   <img src="http://i223.photobucket.com/albums/dd7/Oowatanite/MIsc/600px-Red_x_svg.png" alt="image">

<p><br></p>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Some stupid sucksters still don&#39;t get it.  <img height="15" src="http://www.ezboard.com/image/emoticons_classic/eyes.gif" width="15" alt="image">

<p><br></p> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Oowatanite)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2929893</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 14:02:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Parvati - NEW AMBER BUT MORE ENTERTAINING AND LESS DESERVING!!!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2929857/t/Parvati-NEW-AMBER-BUT-MORE-ENTERTAINING-AND-LESS-DESERVING-.html#reply-2929857</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Don&#39;t get me wrong. She earn her victory, but given how many quitters, injuries and morons playing this season, it is almost given. Almost. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (finishthemoff)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2929857</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 13:53:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Parvati - NEW AMBER BUT MORE ENTERTAINING AND LESS DESERVING!!!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2929839/t/Parvati-NEW-AMBER-BUT-MORE-ENTERTAINING-AND-LESS-DESERVING-.html#reply-2929839</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The slut strategy worked. The end. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (CFmomma)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2929839</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 13:46:18 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Parvati - NEW AMBER BUT MORE ENTERTAINING AND LESS DESERVING!!!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2929797/t/Parvati-NEW-AMBER-BUT-MORE-ENTERTAINING-AND-LESS-DESERVING-.html#reply-2929797</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">shoeless rye wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  This show was rigged. You cast unabashed man-haters/feminists Parvati, Alexis, Natalie and Alexis along with Amanda(teamed with Todd and Courtney) and Cirie
  (will go with the numbers) and a bunch of moron guys - Erik, Jason, Joel, James, Fairplay, and Chet (and some would argue Ozzy here as well). We don&#39;t
  know enough about Mikey B, so basically you had two male strategists in Penner and Yao.... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (AllMenAreIslands)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2929797</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 13:36:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Parvati - NEW AMBER BUT MORE ENTERTAINING AND LESS DESERVING!!!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2929682/t/Parvati-NEW-AMBER-BUT-MORE-ENTERTAINING-AND-LESS-DESERVING-.html#reply-2929682</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Us Kids Know wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  Um, that makes no fucking sense.
</blockquote>

<p> Actually, I thought it made perfect sense.  When Amanda lost her alliance, who did she run to. Parv, who protected her, Parv.
<br>
<br>
When SHe need help finding the Idol, who did Amanda run to,...  Parv
<br>
<br>
When Alexis, Nat,Ciri, and Eric wanted Amanda gone, who saved her....... Parv
<br>
<br>
When Amanda found the idol, and wanted to vote out Natalie,... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Battlekid)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2929682</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 13:09:29 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Parvati - NEW AMBER BUT MORE ENTERTAINING AND LESS DESERVING!!!!  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/31963/t/Parvati-NEW-AMBER-BUT-MORE-ENTERTAINING-AND-LESS-DESERVING-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ And Jeff once accurately predict that you will be.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (finishthemoff)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/31963</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 21:05:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>