<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>This is a thread about how Edgic is spoiled  - ***SPOILERS IN THREAD*** </title>
        <link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/26475/t/---thread---Edgic--spoiled-SPOILERS--THREAD-.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ I&#39;m throwing down the gauntlet to all you &quot;edgic is spoiled&quot; people.  It&#39;s wholly inappropriate to discuss spoilers in edgic, so to all of
you who drive by saying &quot;you&#39;re all spoiled neener neener neener&quot;, this is your place to actually prove it.  Name names, name spoilers (with
Sunsawed&#39;s permission since this is Spec), but be specific because I am not buying the general &quot;you&#39;re spoiled [whaaaaa]&quot; posts.


I&#39;ll start with a very specific... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:12:34 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:56:32 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: This is a thread about how Edgic is spoiled  - ***SPOILERS IN THREAD***  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3024688/t/---thread---Edgic--spoiled-SPOILERS--THREAD-.html#reply-3024688</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Yeah, by episode 3, the possible winners were basically down to 4 or 5 contenders, and when we&#39;re given three votes and Parvati&#39;s edit is one of the
best, then it makes sense that she&#39;d spike when she did. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Kitty Pryde1)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3024688</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:56:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: This is a thread about how Edgic is spoiled  - ***SPOILERS IN THREAD***  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3024676/t/---thread---Edgic--spoiled-SPOILERS--THREAD-.html#reply-3024676</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Wasn&#39;t the main reason that Parvati jumped up in episode 3 because two of the big contenders basically got edits that knocked them down?  I mean, Jonathan
got his OTT yelling at Cirie and negativity for that and Tracy got an INV.  So with them gone, it was basically Parvati and Eliza. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Kitty Pryde1)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3024676</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:52:47 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: This is a thread about how Edgic is spoiled  - ***SPOILERS IN THREAD***  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3023650/t/---thread---Edgic--spoiled-SPOILERS--THREAD-.html#reply-3023650</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Okay, listen y&#39;all, I don&#39;t give 2 shits either way on this.  Chap is a very intelligent and reasonable poster, so I wanted to contribute from a
totally unbiased point of view.
<br>
<br>
My point is that as I read the first couple pages of the house of cards thread, yes, there is speculation all over the board, but if I were to wade through it
all and make a pick based on that, I would pick Parvati.  I think (my opinion, and I think it&#39;s reasonable) that a majority of unbiased... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (grodney)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3023650</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 08:40:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: This is a thread about how Edgic is spoiled  - ***SPOILERS IN THREAD***  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2996040/t/---thread---Edgic--spoiled-SPOILERS--THREAD-.html#reply-2996040</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I made that comment faceitously, grodney.  There was nothing in those clues that specifically pointed to a Parvati win.  As Oowatanite mentioned, a lot of
people actually thought it meant the showmance alliance would collapse and one of the non-showmancers would win.  Some people even thought it pointed to an
Amanda win.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ProbstFan123)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2996040</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 14:06:49 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: This is a thread about how Edgic is spoiled  - ***SPOILERS IN THREAD***  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2991720/t/---thread---Edgic--spoiled-SPOILERS--THREAD-.html#reply-2991720</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I wouldn&#39;t be surprised if Spoilers as smart as Volcanic Glass, who knew the F2, relied mostly on Parvati vs Amanda&#39;s ep1-4 edit to confirm that
Parvati won. Even finalists are often mistaken or wrong about whether they have won.
<br>
<br>

<blockquote>
  Ep2 Parv was 36% winner.
  <br>
  Ep3 Parv was 72% winner.
  <br>
  <br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Very selective use of stats. Parvati was #1 after episode 1, and Jonathan got a good edit ep,.2 but crash and burned ep.3. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (craig)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2991720</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 08:13:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: This is a thread about how Edgic is spoiled  - ***SPOILERS IN THREAD***  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2986738/t/---thread---Edgic--spoiled-SPOILERS--THREAD-.html#reply-2986738</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ No, you don&#39;t get it.  Those pics were clues posted by VG as a game for the sucksters.  &quot;Solve the clues&quot;.  There was a tonne of speculation of
what the clues meant.  There were thoughts that &quot;Cirie won&quot;.  And &quot;Amanda won&quot;.  And &quot;Alexis won&quot;.  And &quot;Parvati won&quot;. 
Your feeble attempt to screw with the viability of Edgic led you to arbitrarily pick and choose whatever stats &quot;proved&quot; your hypothesis.
<br>
<br>
Okay genius, how do... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Oowatanite)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2986738</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 12:57:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: This is a thread about how Edgic is spoiled  - ***SPOILERS IN THREAD***  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2985451/t/---thread---Edgic--spoiled-SPOILERS--THREAD-.html#reply-2985451</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ You don&#39;t get it, do you? ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (grodney)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2985451</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 22:52:24 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: This is a thread about how Edgic is spoiled  - ***SPOILERS IN THREAD***  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2984996/t/---thread---Edgic--spoiled-SPOILERS--THREAD-.html#reply-2984996</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Yep, that thread page had some Parvati references on it.  You know, after the first post that had said &quot;Alexis ftw&quot;.  And somewhere around the post
with the pic of the falling cards, reading &quot;AMAN&quot;da.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Try again.  <img height="15" src="http://www.ezboard.com/image/emoticons_classic/eyes.gif" width="15" alt="image">
<br>
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Oowatanite)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2984996</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 21:04:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: This is a thread about how Edgic is spoiled  - ***SPOILERS IN THREAD***  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2983330/t/---thread---Edgic--spoiled-SPOILERS--THREAD-.html#reply-2983330</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>The house of cards clue was posted between ep2 and ep3.
<br>
<br>
There was much Parvati talk after that clue, as shown here:
<br>
<a target="_blank" href="http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/topic/26793?page=1">http://survivorsucks.yuku.com/topic/26793?page=1</a>
<br>
<br>
ProbstFan123 even said:
<br>
&quot;So if history repeats itself, Parvati should be the overwhelming edgic pick by this time next week.&quot;
<br>
<br>
The house of cards clue was posted between ep2 and ep3.
<br>
<br>
Ep2 Parv... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (grodney)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2983330</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 1981 14:11:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: This is a thread about how Edgic is spoiled  - ***SPOILERS IN THREAD***  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2965823/t/---thread---Edgic--spoiled-SPOILERS--THREAD-.html#reply-2965823</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ omg it&#39;s so awful to see so many Edgic haters in here. Thank GOD we stuck (for the most part) with Parvati. I know I did, other than in the middle where I
suspected Eliza would &quot;snake&quot; her. It was always Eliza/Parv for me until Eliza got booted, and then Cirie was the default second pick. So refreshing
to see a victory for Edgic. I&#39;m not bothered by the critics since I know I&#39;m doing Edgic the right way (actually the wrong way when I thought Katie
would win but y&#39;all... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (JaMalle)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2965823</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 00:45:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: This is a thread about how Edgic is spoiled  - ***SPOILERS IN THREAD***  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2947225/t/---thread---Edgic--spoiled-SPOILERS--THREAD-.html#reply-2947225</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Oowatanite wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  Just to clarify, there was no &quot;Alexis makes it to the finals&quot; spoilers. Natalie and Alexis were spoiled to make the family visit and, after
  Natalie&#39;s opening string of INV/UTR1, Alexis at that time had the best &quot;fan&quot; edit. So some sucksters had her as the last fan standing, probably
  at the end of the game. She was hidden for a while but still edgically viable, despite the string of UTRs... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (astroline)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2947225</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 20:28:57 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: This is a thread about how Edgic is spoiled  - ***SPOILERS IN THREAD***  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2937662/t/---thread---Edgic--spoiled-SPOILERS--THREAD-.html#reply-2937662</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Great, I responded last night and see no post and got the &quot;yuku teams&quot; fix it message.  Oh well.
<br>
<br>
I&#39;ll leave it at this for now and say some item for thought.
<br>
<br>
The first season was what it was.  New, Rich Hatch in your face winning but the villain, so fans&#39; wouldn&#39;t believe it.  Second season, Burnett comments
that this time he&#39;s doing things opposite.  Hence, no Tina to start things.
<br>
<br>
Since then, there have been 14 Survivor games.  The... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (OnlyTheHunter)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2937662</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 08:23:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: This is a thread about how Edgic is spoiled  - ***SPOILERS IN THREAD***  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2936904/t/---thread---Edgic--spoiled-SPOILERS--THREAD-.html#reply-2936904</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  That&#39;s the basic guide. It isn&#39;t that all winners are the same, which at least to me is Quiddity&#39;s arguement (please correct it). It&#39;s that
  they tend to be in the middle. But the middle is different each season. Our job is to rate everyone fairly to see where the middle hits. Nothing amazing, or
  more importantly, condescending bout it. Stop reading spoilers and try it. Playing Edgic is actually fun. Why not give it a chance?
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
OTH, my... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Quiddity)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2936904</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 22:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: This is a thread about how Edgic is spoiled  - ***SPOILERS IN THREAD***  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2936208/t/---thread---Edgic--spoiled-SPOILERS--THREAD-.html#reply-2936208</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Thanks for the clarification. Trix.  I just remembered the Natalie spoiler where &quot;her friend wins the family RC and takes Nat as well&quot; (with her mom
we found out later), followed later by the &quot;Mid-jury to Late game&quot;.
<br>
<br>
<br>
But I don&#39;t think that spoilers affected Alexis&#39; Edgic support.  She did have a good first episode and it was only after her weak episode 4 that she
loss support by everyone except Blake, OTH and gettingreal,  aka &quot;The Three... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Oowatanite)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2936208</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 20:07:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: This is a thread about how Edgic is spoiled  - ***SPOILERS IN THREAD***  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2937511/t/---thread---Edgic--spoiled-SPOILERS--THREAD-.html#reply-2937511</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Oowatanite wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  Thanks for the clarification. Trix. I just remembered the Natalie spoiler where &quot;her friend wins the family RC and takes Nat as well&quot; (with her mom
  we found out later), followed later by the &quot;Mid-jury to Late game&quot;.
  <br>
  <br>
  <br>
  But I don&#39;t think that spoilers affected Alexis&#39; Edgic support. She did have a good first episode and it was only after her weak episode 4 that she... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Trixiego)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2937511</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 18:56:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: This is a thread about how Edgic is spoiled  - ***SPOILERS IN THREAD***  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2935632/t/---thread---Edgic--spoiled-SPOILERS--THREAD-.html#reply-2935632</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ A note of clarification Oow. Alexis was not just spoiled to make family visit.  She was spoiled in late January by SFever and TDT &quot;mid-jury to late
game&quot; &quot;mid jury or better&quot; respectively.
<br>
<br>
This was at the end of January; I didn&#39;t bother reading after that but she was certainly bumped up in the stats after late January.
<br>
<br>
Considering at that time the list read with Alexis, Amanda, Parvati as &quot;mid jury to late game&quot; and Natalie as &quot;late... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Trixiego)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2935632</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 18:54:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: This is a thread about how Edgic is spoiled  - ***SPOILERS IN THREAD***  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2931783/t/---thread---Edgic--spoiled-SPOILERS--THREAD-.html#reply-2931783</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I was too nice to go out and say bogus, but Oo is right, I did feel that way.  Alexis had a substance issue, but winners have pre-merge.  She was viable, but
Parvati always was too.  I had hinkies about returning player seasons, that certainly was on other minds also.  But so many fans were Edgically DOA sooooo
quickly weren&#39;t they?
<br>
<br>
Michael ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (OnlyTheHunter)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2931783</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 21:43:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: This is a thread about how Edgic is spoiled  - ***SPOILERS IN THREAD***  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2931597/t/---thread---Edgic--spoiled-SPOILERS--THREAD-.html#reply-2931597</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Just to clarify, there was no &quot;Alexis makes it to the finals&quot; spoilers.  Natalie and Alexis were spoiled to make the family visit and, after
Natalie&#39;s opening string of INV/UTR1, Alexis at that time had the best &quot;fan&quot; edit.  So some sucksters had her as the last fan standing, probably
at the end of the game.  She was hidden for a while but still edgically viable, despite the string of UTRs received while players were quitting and evacuating
and New Airai was avoiding... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Oowatanite)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2931597</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 21:02:57 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: This is a thread about how Edgic is spoiled  - ***SPOILERS IN THREAD***  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2931504/t/---thread---Edgic--spoiled-SPOILERS--THREAD-.html#reply-2931504</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I suppose that&#39;s fair, but I&#39;d welcome you in a heartbeat.  And feel free to gufaw out loud at me.  I earn that nearly every post!  Hope you would
reconsider, since it&#39;s a long offseason, that&#39;s all I could ask.
<br>
<br>
Michael ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (OnlyTheHunter)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2931504</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 20:42:07 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: This is a thread about how Edgic is spoiled  - ***SPOILERS IN THREAD***  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/2931410/t/---thread---Edgic--spoiled-SPOILERS--THREAD-.html#reply-2931410</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  Why not give it a chance?
  <br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Because I&#39;ve been told I&#39;m not welcome, and after some of the interactions I&#39;ve had with a few people, I wouldn&#39;t want to be involved anyways.
Which is not to say that everyone in the thread is a huge asshole, but enough people. I&#39;ll just continue to read along and snicker at some people, and
wonder what show some people are watching, and so on and so forth. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (cindidindi76)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/2931410</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 20:21:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ This is a thread about how Edgic is spoiled  - ***SPOILERS IN THREAD***  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/26475/t/---thread---Edgic--spoiled-SPOILERS--THREAD-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>I&#39;m throwing down the gauntlet to all you &quot;edgic is spoiled&quot; people.  It&#39;s wholly inappropriate to discuss spoilers in edgic, so to all of
you who drive by saying &quot;you&#39;re all spoiled neener neener neener&quot;, this is your place to actually prove it.  Name names, name spoilers (with
Sunsawed&#39;s permission since this is Spec), but be specific because I am not buying the general &quot;you&#39;re spoiled [whaaaaa]&quot; posts.
<br>
<br>
I&#39;ll start with a... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (chaperone)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/26475</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:12:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>