An idea to improve Survivor so that weaklings dont comprise the finals http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/21912/t/-idea--improve-Survivor---weaklings-dont-comprise--finals.html en-us Copyright 2006, Yuku feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster) webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster) Sat, 15 Dec 2007 22:23:28 GMT Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:06:21 GMT Yuku Feeds 1.0 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Yuku http://static.yuku.com//feed/bypass/images/button-yuku.png http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/21912/t/-idea--improve-Survivor---weaklings-dont-comprise--finals.html Yuku - free hosted forums and profiles 88 31 {pics-1.1 "http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html" l gen true for "http://yuku.com" r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) "http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html" l gen true for "http://yuku.com" r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 )) Search Search Domain q http://yuku.com/search/direct/ <![CDATA[ Re: An idea to improve Survivor so that weaklings dont comprise the finals ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3217497/t/-idea--improve-Survivor---weaklings-dont-comprise--finals.html#reply-3217497 ArtieeLange wrote:
SFC wrote:

ArtieeLange wrote:

In my system, non-threats are well-known because they never get into the top half of challenges.

So in individual phases players go after the people that always lose Challenges, and keep the strongest until the... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (SFC) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3217497 Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:06:21 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: An idea to improve Survivor so that weaklings dont comprise the finals ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3217384/t/-idea--improve-Survivor---weaklings-dont-comprise--finals.html#reply-3217384 feeds@yuku.com (Torchflame) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3217384 Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:46:05 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: An idea to improve Survivor so that weaklings dont comprise the finals ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3217146/t/-idea--improve-Survivor---weaklings-dont-comprise--finals.html#reply-3217146 SFC wrote:

ArtieeLange wrote:

In my system, non-threats are well-known because they never get into the top half of challenges.

So in individual phases players go after the people that always lose Challenges, and keep the strongest until the end?

Under the current system, threats are always targets. Under... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (ArtieeLange) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3217146 Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:59:16 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: An idea to improve Survivor so that weaklings dont comprise the finals ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3214249/t/-idea--improve-Survivor---weaklings-dont-comprise--finals.html#reply-3214249
ArtieeLange wrote:

In the current system, there are no "liabilities" because the teams don't care about winning, since they can just vote out threats.

If that is the case then how did Ozzy, Erik, and Amanda, three of the strongest members of the New Malakal tribe all made the merge and Tracy, Chet, and Ami the weaker ones didn't?

feeds@yuku.com (SFC) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3214249 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:55:51 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: An idea to improve Survivor so that weaklings dont comprise the finals ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3214192/t/-idea--improve-Survivor---weaklings-dont-comprise--finals.html#reply-3214192 SFC wrote:

Chet would slip under the radar as a non threat, in the current system he sticks out like a sore thumb as someone who is a liability.

In the current system, there are no "liabilities" because the teams don't care about winning, since they can just vote out threats. In my system, non-threats are well-known because they never get into the top half of challenges. So again,... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (ArtieeLange) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3214192 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:40:39 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: An idea to improve Survivor so that weaklings dont comprise the finals ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3214028/t/-idea--improve-Survivor---weaklings-dont-comprise--finals.html#reply-3214028 ArtieeLange wrote:

Kitty Pryde1 wrote:
Chet would last all 39 days under your system

Notwithstanding your stupid predictions, the only way to last 39 days under my system is to succeed at challenges, succeed at strategizing, or... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (SFC) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3214028 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:07:27 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: An idea to improve Survivor so that weaklings dont comprise the finals ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3213452/t/-idea--improve-Survivor---weaklings-dont-comprise--finals.html#reply-3213452 Kitty Pryde1 wrote:

Chet would last all 39 days under your system

Notwithstanding your stupid predictions, the only way to last 39 days under my system is to succeed at challenges, succeed at strategizing, or both. It's irrelevant if your lil brain predicts Chet would fall into one of those categories or not, though what we know about Chet is that he hid behind the permanent teams of the current system, and... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (ArtieeLange) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3213452 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:19:14 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: An idea to improve Survivor so that weaklings dont comprise the finals ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3210974/t/-idea--improve-Survivor---weaklings-dont-comprise--finals.html#reply-3210974 feeds@yuku.com (Kitty Pryde1) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3210974 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:41:13 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: An idea to improve Survivor so that weaklings dont comprise the finals ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3210358/t/-idea--improve-Survivor---weaklings-dont-comprise--finals.html#reply-3210358 ArtieeLange wrote:

SFC wrote:
even in your system Parvati still would have won because both players would take her to the Final 2

ah HA! See this is where you need a lil help with the complicated hypotheticals.

In my system, Parvati wouldn't have made it to the final 3 (unless she was just http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3210358 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 04:36:27 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: An idea to improve Survivor so that weaklings dont comprise the finals ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3210284/t/-idea--improve-Survivor---weaklings-dont-comprise--finals.html#reply-3210284 SFC wrote:

even in your system Parvati still would have won because both players would take her to the Final 2

ah HA! See this is where you need a lil help with the complicated hypotheticals.

In my system, Parvati wouldn't have made it to the final 3 (unless she was just acting dumb and uncoordinated).


]]> feeds@yuku.com (ArtieeLange) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3210284 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 03:47:33 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: An idea to improve Survivor so that weaklings dont comprise the finals ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3209911/t/-idea--improve-Survivor---weaklings-dont-comprise--finals.html#reply-3209911 Phuz1 wrote:
Hello. I'm Executive Producer Mark Burnett.

I think this is a wonderful idea.

To make it better, Stephene will always be at the loser's camp, and Rupert will be at the winner's camp.

Then we can hear her complain and cry, and hear him RAWR to celebrate. It'll be ratings gold!

Thank you for your most helpful... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Coachocd) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3209911 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 01:15:45 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: An idea to improve Survivor so that weaklings dont comprise the finals ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3209822/t/-idea--improve-Survivor---weaklings-dont-comprise--finals.html#reply-3209822 ArtieeLange wrote:
So look at this game of "Survivor". You have three competitors left. One struggles and succeeds. One struggles and fails. One feels like she doesn't need to win, so doesn't struggle at all. And then goes on to win. image
... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (SFC) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3209822 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:48:24 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: An idea to improve Survivor so that weaklings dont comprise the finals ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3208547/t/-idea--improve-Survivor---weaklings-dont-comprise--finals.html#reply-3208547 oh ehm gee wrote:
But...she did struggle since day one.

I have higher standards for "struggle". Simply bonding with losers is not an individual test, otherwise anyone including Chet and Kathy "struggled since day one"...until they gave up?

Nay, Cirie learned what struggling was at the final 3 challenge, A for Effort, but we all learned with her that she doesn't have what it... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (ArtieeLange) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3208547 Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:38:54 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: An idea to improve Survivor so that weaklings dont comprise the finals ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3205297/t/-idea--improve-Survivor---weaklings-dont-comprise--finals.html#reply-3205297 ArtieeLange wrote:

oh ehm gee wrote:

Darrah is more entertaining than Sandra.
Terry is more entertaining than Shane/Courtney/Cirie.
Kelly W is more entertaining than Hatch or Rudy.
Amanda is more entertaining than Catalie or Courtney.



They were only entertaining when they... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (oh ehm gee) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3205297 Tue, 22 Jul 2008 06:44:17 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: An idea to improve Survivor so that weaklings dont comprise the finals ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3205254/t/-idea--improve-Survivor---weaklings-dont-comprise--finals.html#reply-3205254 I was in a Survivor ORG game once, I didn't participate at all, ended up on the jury, and decided in one post who should win (and everyone listened). image ]]> feeds@yuku.com (getting real) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3205254 Tue, 22 Jul 2008 05:31:06 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: An idea to improve Survivor so that weaklings dont comprise the finals ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3204958/t/-idea--improve-Survivor---weaklings-dont-comprise--finals.html#reply-3204958 Dictatorship wrote:

Stop bumping your own thread, douche. image

I have many posts to reply to, stupid.

]]> feeds@yuku.com (ArtieeLange) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3204958 Tue, 22 Jul 2008 03:07:25 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: An idea to improve Survivor so that weaklings dont comprise the finals ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3202576/t/-idea--improve-Survivor---weaklings-dont-comprise--finals.html#reply-3202576 ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Dictatorship) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3202576 Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:41:23 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: An idea to improve Survivor so that weaklings dont comprise the finals ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3202569/t/-idea--improve-Survivor---weaklings-dont-comprise--finals.html#reply-3202569 oh ehm gee wrote:

Darrah is more entertaining than Sandra.
Terry is more entertaining than Shane/Courtney/Cirie.
Kelly W is more entertaining than Hatch or Rudy.
Amanda is more entertaining than Catalie or Courtney.



They were only entertaining when they were willing to struggle to win the game. The first time big-Cirie struggled was as entertaining as it... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (ArtieeLange) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3202569 Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:39:38 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: An idea to improve Survivor so that weaklings dont comprise the finals ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3200074/t/-idea--improve-Survivor---weaklings-dont-comprise--finals.html#reply-3200074 oh ehm gee wrote:

ORG = online reality game

I was in a Survivor ORG game once, I didn't participate at all, ended up on the jury, and decided in one post who should win (and everyone listened).

oh ehm gee wrote:
Continue with the circular arguing, everyone.

Is there a valid argument against my system that hasn't... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (ArtieeLange) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3200074 Mon, 21 Jul 2008 05:12:48 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: An idea to improve Survivor so that weaklings dont comprise the finals ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/3194598/t/-idea--improve-Survivor---weaklings-dont-comprise--finals.html#reply-3194598
Continue with the circular arguing, everyone. ]]> feeds@yuku.com (oh ehm gee) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/3194598 Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:03:14 GMT <![CDATA[ An idea to improve Survivor so that weaklings dont comprise the finals ]]> http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/21912/t/-idea--improve-Survivor---weaklings-dont-comprise--finals.html
Since the team-players are AWARE of this, they will not focus on winning as a team.

The weak will target the better players to vote off, because they are thinking of the merge and the individual challenge.

If the game remained team-based throughout, they would keep their better... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (ArtieeLange) http://www.survivorsucks.com/topic/21912 Sat, 15 Dec 2007 22:23:28 GMT