Rage against the Survivor Puritans

Re: Rage against the Survivor Puritans

feeds@yuku.com (Dr Will Hatch two point oh) — Mon, 12 May 2008 08:01:47 GMT

Funny, the only "physically weak" female winner I can think of is Sandra. Alot of people don't like Parvati winning Sensei, you might be the exception, but even still, your post shows how out of touch you are with the state of the show(I'm sorry, that came out wrong, you know much more about the show then me). I mean, Suckster puritans to me sound like Christian fundamentialists. Its almost like most fundies believe Jesus was born in the midwest, and you guys think Survivor...

Re: Rage against the Survivor Puritans

feeds@yuku.com (SenseiKreese) — Mon, 12 May 2008 01:24:49 GMT

I'm a puritan and I thought the Parvati win was great. A final two instead of a final three? A physically weak female walking away with the win? How can you get any more old school than that? I loved the ending to Micronesia.

Re: Rage against the Survivor Puritans

feeds@yuku.com (Dr Will Hatch two point oh) — Sun, 11 May 2008 21:19:46 GMT

Parvati was awesome.Suck it puritans

Re: Rage against the Survivor Puritans

feeds@yuku.com (Dr Will Hatch two point oh) — Sat, 29 Dec 2007 10:30:38 GMT

Thanks alot you dolt bastards, you drove Ravu away

Re: Rage against the Survivor Puritans

feeds@yuku.com (Dr Will Hatch two point oh) — Sat, 15 Dec 2007 18:49:45 GMT

I have another criticism for survivor puritans. I dont appreciate the pre ass, post ass divide between contestents. Theres nothing inherent in mactors and post ass castaways that make them less worthy of your hallowed tv program. They have the same physiological and mental states as everyone else, and just because survivor isnt what it used to be, thats no reason to come down on them

Re: Rage against the Survivor Puritans

feeds@yuku.com (Mr Steven Seagal) — Sat, 15 Dec 2007 16:30:32 GMT

RavuRules wrote:
Why would I think you're a Ghostie? Because you're a supposed newbie and you know words like "troll," and all of your posts have basically been in the CI threads passionately attacking me. It's almost as if *gasp* your sole Sucks existence was predicated to help someone tag team attack me on the CI issue! And of course, because you're almost identical to some of the other posters here,...

Re: Rage against the Survivor Puritans

feeds@yuku.com (Kitty Pryde1) — Sat, 15 Dec 2007 15:54:33 GMT

Okay, can we PLEASE stop this arguing? Ravu, just ignore us, please. Anti-CI people, just ignore Ravu, please. Seriously, when it's not about CI, we can all behave like civilized people, so there's no reason why we can't ALL try to be civil when discussing CI.

Re: Rage against the Survivor Puritans

feeds@yuku.com (RavuRules) — Sat, 15 Dec 2007 15:51:29 GMT

Yeah that's right just keep telling yourself that I'm a ghostnic if it gets you through the night but that doesn't make my words less true now does it? Now go add that to your Cook Islands propaganda.

Why would I think you're a Ghostie? Because you're a supposed newbie and you know words like "troll," and all of your posts have basically been in the CI threads passionately attacking me. It's...

Re: Rage against the Survivor Puritans

feeds@yuku.com (sweEt Mauritius) — Sat, 15 Dec 2007 15:47:24 GMT

Nevermind.

So... puritans....

Re: Rage against the Survivor Puritans

feeds@yuku.com (Mr Steven Seagal) — Sat, 15 Dec 2007 15:38:51 GMT

Yeah that's right just keep telling yourself that I'm a ghostnic if it gets you through the night but that doesn't make my words less true now does it? Now go add that to your Cook Islands propaganda.

Re: Rage against the Survivor Puritans

feeds@yuku.com (RavuRules) — Sat, 15 Dec 2007 15:32:57 GMT

COC trolling > Mr. SS's trolling and he doesn't even need to fake being a legitimate poster because everyone knows he's not a racist Ghostie

By the way, I'm just going to start attacking people who attack me 1st from here on out, so if I say "racist" now, it's not for the original reasons (which were different and rationally based in terms of viewer bias). I don't need to be civil to people who are acting like bitches to me. If...

Re: Rage against the Survivor Puritans

feeds@yuku.com (Mr Steven Seagal) — Sat, 15 Dec 2007 15:16:49 GMT

COC arguments > Ravu's arguments and they don't take 500 paragraphs.

I am in tears

Re: Rage against the Survivor Puritans

feeds@yuku.com (RavuRules) — Sat, 15 Dec 2007 15:12:15 GMT

It's a sad day when you use fanofcoils's random comments to bolster your arguments

Anyways, to stop the rants, I've decided on just fixing the hate comments which bother me. That way you still get your freedom of hate speech, I can express my displeasure by altering your statements to fit how I'd have personally wanted you to word them (without altering their original...

Re: Rage against the Survivor Puritans

feeds@yuku.com (Kitty Pryde1) — Sat, 15 Dec 2007 14:56:26 GMT

*starts a slow clap for FoC*

Re: Rage against the Survivor Puritans

feeds@yuku.com (Quiddity) — Sat, 15 Dec 2007 14:55:55 GMT

I always think that Survivor has to evolve, it can never go back to being 16 people with no twists, won't work anymore. The show has to change in order to stay fresh. I may not be a big fan of bloated casts or the final three but it keeps things interesting and different. If it was still just 16 people, plus a tribe swap every season, I probably would have abandoned the show by now. I appreciated twists, and failed twists. Mutiny made Cook Islands interesting, I was...

Re: Rage against the Survivor Puritans

feeds@yuku.com (ptcruisn56) — Sat, 15 Dec 2007 14:49:07 GMT

I always think that Survivor has to evolve, it can never go back to being 16 people with no twists, won't work anymore. The show has to change in order to stay fresh. I may not be a big fan of bloated casts or the final three but it keeps things interesting and different. If it was still just 16 people, plus a tribe swap every season, I probably would have abandoned the show by now. I appreciated twists, and failed twists. Mutiny made Cook Islands interesting, I was so excited for the...

Re: Rage against the Survivor Puritans

feeds@yuku.com (angstygoldfish) — Sat, 15 Dec 2007 14:25:59 GMT

RavuRules wrote:
TWoP

for using TWoP as a argument source point, you are now dead. to. me.

Re: Rage against the Survivor Puritans

feeds@yuku.com (seltzer3) — Sat, 15 Dec 2007 13:50:02 GMT

I think it just best if everyone just drops this conversation. Doesn't matter who started what. Not "I will stop, if person b stops." Just drop it.

So, on that note. :p

Does anyone like Survivor Marquesas? One of my favorite seasons.

Re: Rage against the Survivor Puritans

feeds@yuku.com (RavuRules) — Sat, 15 Dec 2007 13:46:09 GMT

Oh I see. Miscommunication. I meant:

You're not as crazy as like some of the others, but it just looks like a strategic ploy to come off objective and credible by playing the role of the impartial

Fixed

Re: Rage against the Survivor Puritans

feeds@yuku.com (molemantn) — Sat, 15 Dec 2007 13:45:17 GMT

RavuRules wrote:

I never called you "crazy". I have no idea where you got that from. I have to say though, the more people misinterpret what I say, the more I question their ability to really grasp reality or understanding of things

Did you not say this?

You're not as crazy as like some of the others, but it just looks like a strategic ploy to come off...

Rage against the Survivor Puritans

feeds@yuku.com (Dr Will Hatch two point oh) — Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:46:06 GMT

Even though it doesn't sem that way, I actually am closer to the opinions of ravu and other people on the board who didn't start with the first
season(akthough I did). I think most of you who hold opinions that are rigid and biased in favor of earlier seasons, and not only that, but only certain types
of contestents, are unfocused in your thinking, and your bias hurts you from seeing things clearly. If its on a purely subjective basis that you like certain
sseasons,...