OutwitOutplay wrote:

---

^ Wow. That's really mature.

If you disagree with someone's opinions, that's not exactly the way to go about it. I'm all for thoughtful discussion. If you think I'm wrong, say why.

I don't go on here looking to prove my point. I go on here to have genuine... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (ilovekelly752) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/5307798 Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:12:05 GMT http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/5305978/t/Rank-the-Winners.html#reply-5305978 OutwitOutplay wrote:

---

^ Wow. That's really mature.

If you disagree with someone's opinions, that's not exactly the way to go about it. I'm all for thoughtful discussion. If you think I'm wrong, say why.

I don't go on here looking to prove my point. I go on here to have genuine conversation with other fans, and I am always open to other ideas.

Survivor has never... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (panurge46) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/5305978 Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:04:59 GMT http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/5305374/t/Rank-the-Winners.html#reply-5305374 OutwitOutplay wrote:

---

Survivor has never been about surviving. It's a game show with the clever premise of survival tied into it, but never has anyone's ability to survive in the outdoors played any huge part in whether he or she won.

Ahora wrote:

She may have been a bitch to people, but people still voted for her to win. And how was she out of the loop in most of the votes? The only times she was out of the loop was Christa & Rupert's boot. 9/11 times that she voted, she voted for the person that left.

... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Ahora) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/5304554 Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:15:42 GMT http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/5304549/t/Rank-the-Winners.html#reply-5304549 panurge46 wrote:

---

OutwitOutplay wrote:

---

To be honest, lately I've really started to re-think what I think about both Sandra, as well as many of the other winners.

The bottom line with Survivor is that you simply need to OUTLAST every other player. You don't need to outwit everyone else (by controlling all the votes). You don't... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (OutwitOutplay) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/5304549 Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:14:42 GMT http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/5304505/t/Rank-the-Winners.html#reply-5304505 Ahora wrote:

She may have been a bitch to people, but people still voted for her to win. And how was she out of the loop in most of the votes? The only times she was out of the loop was Christa & Rupert's boot. 9/11 times that she voted, she voted for the person that left.

Arguing with fans is getting tiresome. Don't you realize that the other option... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (panurge46) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/5304505 Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:00:45 GMT http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/5303286/t/Rank-the-Winners.html#reply-5303286 panurge46 wrote:

---

OutwitOutplay wrote:

---

To be honest, lately I've really started to re-think what I think about both Sandra, as well as many of the other winners.

The bottom line with Survivor is that you simply need to OUTLAST every other player. You don't need to outwit everyone else (by controlling all the votes). You don't... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Ahora) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/5303286 Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:06:53 GMT http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/5303195/t/Rank-the-Winners.html#reply-5303195 OutwitOutplay wrote:

---

To be honest, lately I've really started to re-think what I think about both Sandra, as well as many of the other winners.

The bottom line with Survivor is that you simply need to OUTLAST every other player. You don't need to outwit everyone else (by controlling all the votes). You don't need to even outplay them (in challenges). All you need to do is be the last man or woman... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (panurge46) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/5303195 Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:47:01 GMT http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/5303052/t/Rank-the-Winners.html#reply-5303052 Look, Sandra's awesome, but Pearl Islands' cast was basically full of gigantic characters and hardcore players (which is also why no season since then has yet to approach its level of popularity). Everyone had multiple strategies and bigger fish to fry, and Sandra simply lucked out by being weak in challenges and not on anyone's radar. People like Johnny put off voting for her because they simply saw her as no threat to win. Sandra's win was the Survivor equivalent of a... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (PrettyGoodYear1988) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/5303052 Sun, 08 Nov 2009 12:47:55 GMT http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/5303034/t/Rank-the-Winners.html#reply-5303034

1. Earl
2. Parvati
3. JT
4. Todd
5. Yul
6. Sandra
7. Chris
8. Amber
9. Richard
10. Jenna
11. Tom
12. Brian
13. Vecepia
14. Ethan
15. Danni
16. Aras
17. Bob
18. Tina
... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (solesurvivor123) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/5303034 Sun, 08 Nov 2009 12:39:00 GMT http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/5303026/t/Rank-the-Winners.html#reply-5303026
The bottom line with Survivor is that you simply need to OUTLAST every other player. You don't need to outwit everyone else (by controlling all the votes). You don't need to even outplay them (in challenges). All you need to do is be the last man or woman standing.

And with that criteria it's hard not to see Sandra as a very strong... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (OutwitOutplay) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/5303026 Sun, 08 Nov 2009 12:36:14 GMT http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/5302335/t/Rank-the-Winners.html#reply-5302335 chapera rocks wrote:

---

Sandra... seemed to be the only person in the final 7 or 8 besides Jon/Burton to actually get the game. And they had major flaws themselves.

Q.E.D. ]]> feeds@yuku.com (panurge46) http://www.survivorsucks.com/sreply/5302335 Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:44:16 GMT http://www.survivorsucks.com/reply/5302089/t/Rank-the-Winners.html#reply-5302089 Dr Will Hatch two point oh wrote:

---

Jon is weaker in challenges then Trish.